2008
DOI: 10.5558/tfc84741-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of post-harvest silviculture on use of boreal forest stands by amphibians and marten in Ontario

Abstract: Much of the southern boreal forest is composed of second-growth stands that have been subjected to a variety of silvicultural treatments ranging from cut and leave to scarification, planting, and tending with herbicides. We have limited understanding of the effects that these treatments may have on wildlife species, as a result of changes to forest structures and species composition. Forest amphibians, generally, and the American marten (Martes americana) are species for which there has been long-standing conc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Populations of toads in managed stands appeared to be sustainable while those of wood frogs were low, suggesting a long-term negative effect. On the other hand, Thompson et al (2008) found no differences in capture rates of American toads or wood frogs in regenerating stands at least 32-50 years following harvest in north-eastern Ontario boreal forests, compared with capture rates in old unmanaged stands, suggesting no long-term effects of forest management on either species. An explanation of the disparate results of these two studies could be that the western Ontario boreal receives about half the precipitation that falls in the eastern Ontario boreal.…”
Section: Amphibiansmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Populations of toads in managed stands appeared to be sustainable while those of wood frogs were low, suggesting a long-term negative effect. On the other hand, Thompson et al (2008) found no differences in capture rates of American toads or wood frogs in regenerating stands at least 32-50 years following harvest in north-eastern Ontario boreal forests, compared with capture rates in old unmanaged stands, suggesting no long-term effects of forest management on either species. An explanation of the disparate results of these two studies could be that the western Ontario boreal receives about half the precipitation that falls in the eastern Ontario boreal.…”
Section: Amphibiansmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Managed landscapes with minimal old forests generally supported fewer marten than landscapes with a large proportion of old-forest patches (e.g., Thompson and Harestad 1994;Thompson 1994;Potvin et al 2000;Godbout and Ouellet 2008;Thompson et al 2008). In Newfoundland, however, marten inhabited a landscape with less than 35% mature or older forests (Hearn et al 2010).…”
Section: Martenmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Many forest-dwelling species are dependent on the presence of snags, downed logs, and/or both fine and coarse woody debris (Janowiak & Webster, 2010;Jones, Hanberry, & Demarais, 2009;Tremblay, Ibarzabal, & Savard, 2010;Vanderwel, Malcolm, Caspersen, & Newman, 2010). Other species are dependent on the availability of particular tree species or the presence of a minimum number of trees of a certain diameter (e.g., Thompson et al, 2008). Many forest species rely on the existence of mast-producing trees and shrubs.…”
Section: Silviculture and The Provision Of Lcp Goods And Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Porter et al (2005) documented a marten population successfully inhabiting a young deciduous forest where they preferentially used habitat structures characteristic of older forests. Other studies reporting marten use of younger stands suggest that downed logs, standing snags, and a high conifer content (Chapin et al 1997;Payer and Harrison 2003;Thompson et al 2008) are the key to the effective use of younger stands. However, there is no evidence that large marten populations can be sustained over the long term in intensively managed forests (Thompson et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies reporting marten use of younger stands suggest that downed logs, standing snags, and a high conifer content (Chapin et al 1997;Payer and Harrison 2003;Thompson et al 2008) are the key to the effective use of younger stands. However, there is no evidence that large marten populations can be sustained over the long term in intensively managed forests (Thompson et al 2008). The characteristics and amount of CWD characteristics that contribute to quality marten habitat, also benefit many other species and functions (Bunnell and Houde 2010;Sullivan and Sullivan 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%