To evaluate whether the number of Escherichia coli bacteria in carcass rinses from chicken slaughter establishments could be monitored for the purpose of microbial process control, we drew a random sample from 20 of 127 large USDA-inspected operations. In 2005, every 3 months, two sets of 10 carcass rinses, 100 ml each, were collected from establishments, netting 80 sample sets from the rehang and postchill stages. E. coli and Campylobacter numbers and Salmonella prevalence were measured. Mixed-effect models were used to estimate variance of mean log 10 E. coli cell numbers of 10-carcass rinse sample sets. Relationships between E. coli and Campylobacter and Salmonella were examined. For 10-carcass rinse sets, at both the rehang and postchill stages the mean log 10 E. coli CFU/ml fit the logistic distribution better than the normal distribution. The rehang overall mean log 10 E. coli was 3.3 CFU/ml, with a within-sample set standard deviation of 0.6 CFU/ml. The overall postchill mean log 10 E. coli was 0.8 CFU/ml, with 13 establishments having mean log 10 E. coli CFU/ml values of less than 1.0 and 7 having mean values of 1.2 or more. At the midpoint separating these establishments, a mean log 10 E. coli CFU/ml of 1.1, the within-sample set standard deviation was 0.5 CFU/ml, with smaller standard deviations as means increased. Postchill sample sets with mean log 10 E. coli counts less than or equal to 1.1 CFU/ml had lower overall prevalence of Salmonella and mean log 10 Campylobacter CFU/ml than sample sets with higher means. These findings regarding reductions in E. coli numbers provide insight relevant to microbial process control.Regulatory food microbiology standards are defined and enforced with the intent of protecting public health and maintaining consumer confidence in the safety of the food supply. Resource demands (22) and legal constraints (21) have hindered the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) from enforcing its current Salmonella performance standard (3). For this reason, in 2004 the USDA requested guidance from its national scientific advisory committee on the possible use of E. coli numbers to monitor sanitary conditions during poultry slaughter (12). The committee acknowledged that, if valid, such a performance standard could facilitate inspection of slaughter processing establishments. The committee recommended studies to define how E. coli numbers vary in poultry carcass rinses during poultry processing by processing stage, time of year, and geographic region and with respect to foodborne pathogens.The widespread presence and high numbers of generic E. coli bacteria on poultry entering the slaughter establishment (2,5,14) are suitable characteristics for an indicator organism used to monitor microbial control processes. The ease and lower cost (5, 13) of E. coli enumeration also allow more observations than can be made when comparable resources are allocated for Campylobacter or Salmonella testing (15).Regulatory agencies and food manufacturers have recognized the potential utility of E. col...