1969
DOI: 10.3758/bf03336222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of praise and censure on normal Ss’ performance on a psychomotor task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the former group, reinforcement was provided after every fifth marble as one of five verbal statements presented randomly: "You're doing well;" "That's really good;" "You really know how to play this game;" "Very good;" and "That's fine." While control subjects received no praise, the examiner conversed with them about school activities or home, but not the motor task, because some evidence suggested the absence of comment may be seen as a negative evaluation (Gournard, 1961;Stevenson & Cruse, 1961).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former group, reinforcement was provided after every fifth marble as one of five verbal statements presented randomly: "You're doing well;" "That's really good;" "You really know how to play this game;" "Very good;" and "That's fine." While control subjects received no praise, the examiner conversed with them about school activities or home, but not the motor task, because some evidence suggested the absence of comment may be seen as a negative evaluation (Gournard, 1961;Stevenson & Cruse, 1961).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%