2014
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/aru050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of predation risk on group size, vigilance, and foraging behavior in an African ungulate community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

16
240
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
16
240
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, predation risk affected group size in a way consistent with theoretical predictions that there is reduced individual risk in larger groups (Cresswell and Quinn 2011, Sorato et al 2012, Creel et al 2014), but the direct effects of predation risk on foraging success were weak for early summer fish and non-significant for late summer fish. Predation risk was, however, positively associated with group size during both sampling periodslarger groups formed in habitats of high risk.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Thus, predation risk affected group size in a way consistent with theoretical predictions that there is reduced individual risk in larger groups (Cresswell and Quinn 2011, Sorato et al 2012, Creel et al 2014), but the direct effects of predation risk on foraging success were weak for early summer fish and non-significant for late summer fish. Predation risk was, however, positively associated with group size during both sampling periodslarger groups formed in habitats of high risk.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Standing, rather than eating, could help elephants focus more on the sound, and thereby locate its source and determine if they are in a potentially threatening situation. African ungulates typically spend less time foraging when predators are nearby, with a negative relationship between foraging and vigilance [Creel et al, 2014]. The present study further confirms that elephants respond to potentially threatening stimuli, such as bee buzzing and banging on pots/pans, with distress, vigilance, and avoidance behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Experimental data from a broad range of taxa show that there are at least four mutual benefits that can result from aggregation behaviour: (i) decreased chance of predation (Colbert et al, 2010;Creel et al, 2014;Unglaub et al, 2013), (ii) increased feeding efficiency (Horst, 1995;Jackson et al, 2008;Hsia and Wood-Gush, 1982;Lazarus, 1979), (iii) increased locomotion efficiency (Ebensperger and Bozinovic, 2000;Fish, 1995;Voelkl et al, 2015) and (iv) decreased energy spent on thermoregulation (Gilbert et al, 2008(Gilbert et al, , 2010Nunez-Villegas et al, 2014;Withers and Jarvis, 1980). However, aggregation behaviour may have more than one function within a single species (Lazarus, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%