2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01093-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of preoperative and postoperative epiretinal membranes on macular hole closure and visual restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Vitrectomy for Macular Hole Study Group investigated 91 patients, and found that postoperative ERM formation has no influence on postoperative visual acuity, and that only extensive ERM growth can provoke reopening of the macular hole [3]. Postoperative epiretinal membranes were not noted in our patients, and this may be due to the fact that ILM peeling was performed in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, the Vitrectomy for Macular Hole Study Group investigated 91 patients, and found that postoperative ERM formation has no influence on postoperative visual acuity, and that only extensive ERM growth can provoke reopening of the macular hole [3]. Postoperative epiretinal membranes were not noted in our patients, and this may be due to the fact that ILM peeling was performed in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…After all inclusion criteria were applied, there were 50 articles that fulfilled the prerequisites: 7 studies had arms evaluating both ILM peeling and non-ILM peeling, 3,9,11,[15][16][17][18] 13 studies evaluated non-ILM peeling only, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and 30 studies evaluated ILM peeling only. [4][5][6][7][8]10, Figure 1 shows the flow chart of the selection process used to identify the studies concerned.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the investigation of 91 eyes enrolled in The Vitrectomy for Macular Hole Study Group, stepwise regression analysis revealed that the preoperative hole size was the only predictor of postoperative visual acuity [53]. Traditionally, MH size had been estimated based on biomicroscopic observation or photographic evaluation.…”
Section: Preoperative Predictive Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%