Funding informationNone.Purpose: The aim is to describe a technique with orthograde dissection of the anterior tibial artery (ATA) used as the recipient vessel for the end-to-end (ETE) anastomosis in defect reconstruction around the knee and for proximal/middle third leg defects with free anterolateral thigh (ALT) and gracilis flaps.Patients and methods: Between March 2009 and May 2014, 22 patients undergoing lower extremity reconstruction were evaluated. Of those, 4 patients were included. The locations of injury were 3 defects around the knee and 1 defect at the proximal and middle third of the lower leg (mean defect size 18 x 8.5 cm and a range of 17-20 x 5-10 cm). There were 2 cases after trauma and 2 cases with infection. Two free gracilis and 2 free ALT flaps were performed of equal size to the defects. The mean flap pedicle length was 11 cm (range of 7-16 cm) and the mean length of the mobilized recipient vessels was 10.5 cm (range of 6-14 cm).Results: One flap loss (ALT) occurred, requiring a salvage procedure with a latissimus dorsi flap, whereas wound dehiscence at the donor site and a hematoma below the ALT flap was observed in 2 cases, requiring small revision. After a mean follow-up of 52 months (range of 38-87 months), there was stable soft tissue coverage in all patients.Conclusion: By orthograde dissection of the ATA, an adequate vessel length and size may be achieved, improving arc of rotation to successfully cover more distant defects.
| I N TR ODU C TI ONLower extremity reconstruction remains challenging to treat, especially if <3 vessels are available. Usually, the etiology is traumatic and highenergy injuries are involved. There is a substantial zone of injury associated with a thrombogenic zone of injury. The mechanism usually comprises endothelial damage by perivascular injury, causing alteration in flow dynamics, which again results in a risk of anastomotic and flap failure. Thus, it is most important that the status of peripheral vascular disease be considered in each patient.Options in a 3-vessel lower extremity microsurgical reconstruction are ETE or end-to-side (ETS) anastomosis. However, if fewer than 3 vessels are available, options for a disrupted artery might be ETS or ETE (Cho et al., 2016). Further options might be an arteriovenous loupe,(Cavadas, 2008) a T-shaped pedicle in a flow-through flap, (Song, Li, & Yu, 2016, Nemoto, Ishikawa, Kounoike, Sugimoto, & Takeda, 2015 or a perforator-to-perforator flap (Koshima, Nanba, Tsutsui, Takahashi, & Itoh, 2002). Ideally, the selection of recipient vessels should be proximal to the zone of injury.Compared to the posterior tibial artery (PTA), the ATA has a much higher incidence of injury with more extensive damage (Chen, Chuang, Chen, Hsu, & Wei, 1994). During surgery, the injury can be at a more proximal level than estimated. This should be kept in mind when the anterior tibial vessels are selected as the recipient site in order to minimize re-exploration and flap failure (Chen, Chuang, Chen, Hsu, & Wei, 1994