2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00090-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
71
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
71
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It means that a human operator, acting in the environment through a robotics' telemanipulator tool, can circumscribe his/her range of action almost as precisely as when he/she performs the action with his/her own arm. This result suggests that the perturbation of the visuo-motor frame of reference involves a remapping of the body representation as it has been shown in prismatic experiments (Berberovic & Mattingley, 2003). Moreover, since this remapping occurs after limited training, humans appear to rapidly perceive the affordance of the remote control arm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It means that a human operator, acting in the environment through a robotics' telemanipulator tool, can circumscribe his/her range of action almost as precisely as when he/she performs the action with his/her own arm. This result suggests that the perturbation of the visuo-motor frame of reference involves a remapping of the body representation as it has been shown in prismatic experiments (Berberovic & Mattingley, 2003). Moreover, since this remapping occurs after limited training, humans appear to rapidly perceive the affordance of the remote control arm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Such efforts could also be informed through research in healthy controls, in whom prism adaptation has been shown to produce changes in spatial cognition that resemble some of those that are shown by neglect patients (Bultitude & Woods, 2010;Loftus, Nicholls, Mattingley, & Bradshaw, 2008;Loftus, Vijayakumar, & Nicholls, 2009;Michel et al, 2003;Michel, Pisella, Prablanc, Rode, & Rossetti, 2007;Nicholls, Kamer, & Loftus, 2008). Mirroring the directionally-selective effects of prism adaptation in neglect patients, changes in spatial cognition in healthy controls almost exclusively follow adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms, although there have been isolated reports of such changes following adaptation to rightwardshifting prisms, too (Berberovic & Mattingley, 2003;Striemer, Sablatnig, & Danckert, 2006).…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If BIID evolves from altered attentional processes and/or deficits in integration of sensory information from the affected limb(s), then crossing the limbs, or wear deviating wedge prisms to shift left-sided body space into right body space (e.g., see Berberovic and Mattingley 2003), could provide insight to whether it is simply the left leg that is affected irrespective of body space (implicating body representations and/or multisensory integration), or whether it is the left body space itself that determines the deficit (implicating attentional processes and multisensory integration). Likewise, the "cutaneous rabbit illusion" (Miyazaki et al 2010), mirror visual feedback (Ramachandran et al 1995), virtual reality (Moseley 2007;Soler et al 2010), or rubber hand illusion paradigms could be employed to investigate the relative contribution of deranged body representation, and disordered higher-order multisensory processing-e.g., convergence of vision and tactile sensation-in perceived non-belonging of a limb in BIID.…”
Section: Hypotheses and Further Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%