2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12562-011-0438-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of process and/or observation errors on the stock–recruitment curve and the validity of the proportional model as a stock–recruitment relationship

Abstract: We examined the effects of process and observation errors on the selection of the stock-recruitment relationship (SRR) curve using simulations. When the process and observation errors were added to both spawning stock biomass and recruitment, the results were as follows:(1) When the proportional model was set as the true SRR model, there was a high probability that the Ricker or Beverton and Holt model was selected in response to the errors; (2) When the Ricker or Beverton and Holt model was set as the true SR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results are a matter of course, because the same values in the left-hand side were used in the right-hand side in equation (11). That is, the minimum AIC does not always indicate a valid model and does not show the validity of the existing of density-dependent effect [9]. The last two models in Table 3 are the cases when ln (R) was used as the dependent variable (Models 8 and 9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the results are a matter of course, because the same values in the left-hand side were used in the right-hand side in equation (11). That is, the minimum AIC does not always indicate a valid model and does not show the validity of the existing of density-dependent effect [9]. The last two models in Table 3 are the cases when ln (R) was used as the dependent variable (Models 8 and 9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Generally, these errors would have the effect of hiding the real relationship between R and S [17]. Therefore, those factors must appear to have no relationship between R and S.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon selection of the model with two regimes, Cahuin et al [11] fit the RPS data with the model of Ricker. Sakuramoto and Suzuki [15] explain in detail that when the actual model for a stock-recruitment relationship is a proportional model, observational and/or process errors can result in the selection of a Ricker [17] or Beverton and Holt [19] model. On the contrary, when the actual model is a Ricker [17] or Beverton and Holt [19] model, observational and/or process errors seldom resulted in the selection of a proportional model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the data were adjusted for observational errors and regression analysis was applied to the full data series, the slope of the regression line did not differ significantly from unity indicating the absence of density-dependent effects as well as the absence of two different carrying capacities or regimes. Sakuramoto and Suzuki [15] provide a detailed report on the effect of observation and/or process error which in most cases results from environmental variables on recruitment and/ or SSB in the selection of a stock-recruitment relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%