2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of progestagens and prostaglandin analogues on ovarian function and embryo viability in sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
57
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A reduced fertility after progestagen treatment compared with natural estrus has already been reported [21,22]. Possible explanations for the reduction of fertility in progestagen-treated animals are alterations in final follicle growth [23] and ovulation [22][23][24] as well as impairment of sperm transport and survival in the female reproductive tract, reducing the number of fertilized ova [25,26]. When comparing the percentage of ewes lambing to the first estrus after progestagen treatment in this investigation with that of a study [16] performed the previous year with the same flock, the results are almost equal (69.4% vs. 75%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A reduced fertility after progestagen treatment compared with natural estrus has already been reported [21,22]. Possible explanations for the reduction of fertility in progestagen-treated animals are alterations in final follicle growth [23] and ovulation [22][23][24] as well as impairment of sperm transport and survival in the female reproductive tract, reducing the number of fertilized ova [25,26]. When comparing the percentage of ewes lambing to the first estrus after progestagen treatment in this investigation with that of a study [16] performed the previous year with the same flock, the results are almost equal (69.4% vs. 75%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Secondly, in the present study, the rate of live weight loss during summer time didn't affect changes in IGF-I and estradiol concentrations during the early follicular phase, the ability to re-ovulate after synchronisation with progestagens and the number of ova shed for those animals that attained puberty. In comparison to other breeds of sheep (Gonzalez-Bulnes et al, 2005, Viñoles, 2003, obtained low concentrations of estradiol could be explained by the low age of the animals in this experiment and also by the synchronisation treatment as ovulatory follicles from sheep treated with progestagens show deficiencies in the secretion of estradiol during the preovulatory phase (Gonzalez-Bulnes et al, 2005). With regard to IGF-I concentrations, the absence of differences between ewe lambs in the three classes of live weight over the 42 hrs following sponge removal can be explained by the fact that all the animals ovulated after sponge removal, a finding that is consistent with previous findings by Spicer et al (1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A melhor resposta ovariana pode-se esperar quando as fêmeas são tratadas no início e final da fase luteal. Assim, o início rápido do estro e grande quantidade de animais ovulando são esperados quando as fêmeas são tratadas ao início da fase luteal (González-Bulnes et al, 2005). Em fêmeas ovinas é conhecido que as doses de prostaglandina são efetivas desde o terceiro dia depois da ovulação (Ali et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified