2005
DOI: 10.1021/es048124p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Progressive Anoxia on the Solubility of Technetium in Sediments

Abstract: Technetium is a significant radioactive contaminant from nuclear fuel cycle operations. It is highly mobile in its oxic form (as Tc(VII)O4-) but is scavenged to sediments in its reduced forms (predominantly Tc(IV)). Here we examine the behavior of Tc at low concentrations and as microbial anoxia develops in sediment microcosms. A cascade of stable-element terminal-electron-accepting processes developed in microcosms due to indigenous microbial activity. TcO4- removal from solution occurred during active microb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
117
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
9
117
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly relevant to some nuclear legacy sites such as areas of Hanford (Washington), Oak Ridge (Tennessee), and Rifle (Colorado) in the USA and Sellafield in the UK (Hunter, 2004;Catalano et al, 2006;Kelly et al, 2008;Williams et al, 2009), where invasive surveys may be very difficult due to radiotoxicity of contaminant plumes and the possibility of compromising the hydraulic integrity of the subsurface. The need for monitoring subsurface geochemistry such as redox conditions at contaminated sites has been recognized, because they play a vital role in controlling the mobility of key redox active contaminants such as Cr, U, Tc and As (Finneran et al, 2002;Islam et al, 2004;Burke et al, 2005;. Thus, remote sensing of redox indicators, such as the presence of Fe (II) in groundwater or the formation of sulfide minerals (Ntarlagiannis et al, , 2010aPersonna et al, 2008), would be a highly valuable complementary approach to conventional sampling and geochemical analysis of groundwater.…”
Section: '% ( )And% ('mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly relevant to some nuclear legacy sites such as areas of Hanford (Washington), Oak Ridge (Tennessee), and Rifle (Colorado) in the USA and Sellafield in the UK (Hunter, 2004;Catalano et al, 2006;Kelly et al, 2008;Williams et al, 2009), where invasive surveys may be very difficult due to radiotoxicity of contaminant plumes and the possibility of compromising the hydraulic integrity of the subsurface. The need for monitoring subsurface geochemistry such as redox conditions at contaminated sites has been recognized, because they play a vital role in controlling the mobility of key redox active contaminants such as Cr, U, Tc and As (Finneran et al, 2002;Islam et al, 2004;Burke et al, 2005;. Thus, remote sensing of redox indicators, such as the presence of Fe (II) in groundwater or the formation of sulfide minerals (Ntarlagiannis et al, , 2010aPersonna et al, 2008), would be a highly valuable complementary approach to conventional sampling and geochemical analysis of groundwater.…”
Section: '% ( )And% ('mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether metal oxides retard, promote, or have no impact on the reduction of contaminants largely depends on their mineralogy and free energy, surface area and surface properties, and physical distribution within sediments and soils (Burke et al 2005).…”
Section: Transport and Redox Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where sufficient organic matter is available for oxidation, progressively more anoxic conditions develop and a cascade of terminal-electron-accepting processes occur in sequence (but dependent on the availability of electron acceptors), with either increasing incubation time (Burke et al 2005), or depth within sediments (Froelich et al 1979). Microbial processes releasing most energy are favoured, so the sequence in which electron acceptors are used typically follows the decreasing order of redox potentials shown in Table 1 (calculated from standard thermodynamic data using the Nernst equation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%