“…This is particularly relevant to some nuclear legacy sites such as areas of Hanford (Washington), Oak Ridge (Tennessee), and Rifle (Colorado) in the USA and Sellafield in the UK (Hunter, 2004;Catalano et al, 2006;Kelly et al, 2008;Williams et al, 2009), where invasive surveys may be very difficult due to radiotoxicity of contaminant plumes and the possibility of compromising the hydraulic integrity of the subsurface. The need for monitoring subsurface geochemistry such as redox conditions at contaminated sites has been recognized, because they play a vital role in controlling the mobility of key redox active contaminants such as Cr, U, Tc and As (Finneran et al, 2002;Islam et al, 2004;Burke et al, 2005;. Thus, remote sensing of redox indicators, such as the presence of Fe (II) in groundwater or the formation of sulfide minerals (Ntarlagiannis et al, , 2010aPersonna et al, 2008), would be a highly valuable complementary approach to conventional sampling and geochemical analysis of groundwater.…”