2014
DOI: 10.5176/2345-7880_1.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Proportion of Egg Yolk and Preservation Time on Chilled Semen from Indigenous Rams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
8
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The volume, colour, mass activity, sperm motility, viability, concentration, HOST +ve (%) and normal spermatozoa (%) varied from 0.4-1.3 ml, 2-4 (creamy to creamy-grainy), 2-5, 75-92%, 80-95%, 2500-5000×10 6 /ml, 7590% and 75-95%, respectively. Similar semen quality parameters were observed in previous study of the same laboratory (Mahmuda et al, 2015 andAzizunnesa et al, 2014). In the present study the sperm concentration of ram R#6 was significantly higher (4120.5±93.5x 10 6 /ml) compared with ram R#1, R#4 and R#5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The volume, colour, mass activity, sperm motility, viability, concentration, HOST +ve (%) and normal spermatozoa (%) varied from 0.4-1.3 ml, 2-4 (creamy to creamy-grainy), 2-5, 75-92%, 80-95%, 2500-5000×10 6 /ml, 7590% and 75-95%, respectively. Similar semen quality parameters were observed in previous study of the same laboratory (Mahmuda et al, 2015 andAzizunnesa et al, 2014). In the present study the sperm concentration of ram R#6 was significantly higher (4120.5±93.5x 10 6 /ml) compared with ram R#1, R#4 and R#5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This result is similar with the observation of Mahmuda et al (2015). However, the rate of motility and viability of post thawed semen in the present study were lower than observed by Azizunnesa et al (2014). It is not clear to explain why there is difference from Azizunnesa et al (2014), using the same protocol for freezing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations