Effects of Protective Surface Coating on Fluoride Release and Recharge of Recent Uncoated High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement

Krajangta, Nantawan; Dulsamphan, Chayanee; Chotitanmapong, Tongjai

doi:10.3390/dj10120233

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Numerous in vitro studies have examined the effects of coating agents on the hardness of HVGICs. Other studies have evaluated the effects of coating agents on the water sorption and solubility of HVGICs [23,27,[31][32][33][34][35]. The inconsistency of the data regarding the influence of coating agents on HVGIC and the lack of data on the newly introduced material EQUIA Forte ® HT indicate the need for further investigation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Different Coating Agents on the Microhardness, Water Sorption, and Solubility of EQUIA Forte® HT

Alqasabi,

Sulimany,

Almohareb

et al. 2024

Coatings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of four different surface-coating agents on the microhardness, water sorption, and solubility of the highly viscous glass ionomer cement EQUIA Forte® HT. Materials and methods: A total of 100 cylindrical EQUIA Forte® HT samples were examined, with 50 tested for Vickers hardness and the other 50 for water sorption and solubility. For each test, the specimens were divided into five groups (10 specimens/group) according to coating method: Group 1—no coating (control), Group 2—EQUIA Forte® Coat, Group 3—Single Bond™ Universal Adhesive, Group 4—ExciTE®F adhesive, and Group 5—petroleum jelly. Data were analyzed using the paired t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The mean microhardness of the coated groups was significantly higher than that of the uncoated group. Moreover, a significant difference in the microhardness value was detected between the coated groups. Furthermore, EQUIA Forte® Coat had the highest mean hardness value. The mean water sorption at 7 days showed that EQUIA Forte® Coat had the lowest values. In terms of water solubility, a statistically significant difference was found between no coating and all groups except EQUIA Forte®, between Single Bond Universal Adhesive and petroleum jelly, between petroleum jelly and EQUIA Forte Coat, and between EQUIA Forte® Coat and ExciTE®F. Conclusions: The study revealed that all coating agents significantly increased the microhardness of EQUIA Forte® HT, with EQUIA Forte® Coat showing the highest hardness and the lowest water sorption values.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Different Coating Agents on the Microhardness, Water Sorption, and Solubility of EQUIA Forte® HT

Alqasabi,

Sulimany,

Almohareb

et al. 2024

Coatings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The development of resin-coating materials for enhancing elemental release of coated glass ionomer cements

Panpisut,

Toneluck,

Khamsuk

et al. 2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The impact of dental varnishes on the immediate surface microhardness and roughness of restorative dental materials: An in vitro study

Lovric,

Markovic,

Bulajic

et al. 2023

VOJNOSANIT PREGL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Aim. Dental varnishes are effective in preventing caries in children. This study aims to compare the effect of varnishes containing fluoride and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on the microhardness and roughness of three specific restorative materials in pediatric dental practice. Methods. The study included 60 discs and 60 bars, made from three commonly used dental restorative materials. After preparation and incubation, and subsequent basic measurement, the samples were divided into two subgroups, each of which was treated with fluoride varnish and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate according to a precisely established protocol. After treatment, all samples were retested for microhardness and roughness. Results. The application of fluoride varnish and casein phosphopeptideamorphous calcium phosphate varnish increased the microhardness of the hybrid composite and resin-modified GIC but reduced the microhardness of high-viscosity GIC. The roughness was more pronounced with the composite material, as well as with the resinmodified glass ionomer cement. Conclusion. Prophylactic varnishes containing fluoride and calcium have the potential to alter the microhardness and roughness of dental restorations. It is important to carefully select the appropriate varnish, as it can influence the microhardness and roughness properties of the material.

show abstract

Effects of Protective Surface Coating on Fluoride Release and Recharge of Recent Uncoated High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement

Cited by 5 publications

References 38 publications

The Effect of Different Coating Agents on the Microhardness, Water Sorption, and Solubility of EQUIA Forte® HT

The Effect of Different Coating Agents on the Microhardness, Water Sorption, and Solubility of EQUIA Forte® HT

The development of resin-coating materials for enhancing elemental release of coated glass ionomer cements

The impact of dental varnishes on the immediate surface microhardness and roughness of restorative dental materials: An in vitro study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About