2013
DOI: 10.3956/2012-28.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of proximity to forest habitat on hymenoptera diversity in a Costa Rican coffee agroecosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When investigating the relationship between honey bee and native bee abundance, we found a positive correlation between them, as other studies in Mexican coffee plantations have found (Badano and Vergara, 2011). This fact suggests that honey bees may not yet have saturated this ecosystem, and that, according to Banks et al (2013), the contribution of pollinators from nearby forests to the coffee plantations is still high. This notion can be supported by the fact that honey bees only maintain high populations during coffee flowering, otherwise, their cultured populations are kept to a minimum in the area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When investigating the relationship between honey bee and native bee abundance, we found a positive correlation between them, as other studies in Mexican coffee plantations have found (Badano and Vergara, 2011). This fact suggests that honey bees may not yet have saturated this ecosystem, and that, according to Banks et al (2013), the contribution of pollinators from nearby forests to the coffee plantations is still high. This notion can be supported by the fact that honey bees only maintain high populations during coffee flowering, otherwise, their cultured populations are kept to a minimum in the area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Manuscript to be reviewed Secondary forests as coffee pollinator enhancers. The data of bee abundance, richness and diversity supports the importance of secondary forests for bee pollinators (Arnan 2010, Carvalheiro 2012, Banks et al 2013, Brosi 2008Boreux et al 2013), not only to maintain bee diversity, but also to improve coffee production in the Pacific Coast Foothills of Guatemala. The significant results in the nested anovas remarks how the vegetation interact with bees , they are most abundant in early secondary forests (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Therefore, there would be need to take farm size and management practice into account when calculating beta diversity of coffee farms. Several researchers have, however, specifically examined and found that animal diversity declines with distance from forest fragments (Ricketts et al 2001;Banks et al 2013). In one of a few related plant studies, Moorhead et al (2010) found no significant change in species richness of epiphytes at different distances from forest in a coffee polyculture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Restoration may favour the presence of wild bees (Araújo et al 2018;Taki et al 2018;Alvarenga et al 2020) and parasitoids (Marrec et al 2018), but some hymenopteran assemblages from restored areas may be functionally similar to those from forests (Montoya-Pfeiffer et al 2020), and their diversity has been found to be lower in forests compared to more open areas (Pardo and Gonzalez 2007). Therefore, it seems that, even when the areas labeled as low conservation presented a high degree of perturbation, being embedded into a preserved area matrix helped to increase diversity in these areas, since the hymenopteran diversity is positively affected by the proximity to forest (Banks et al 2013). Furthermore, not all types of forest restoration will equally favour Hymenopterans, with ecological restoration, as applied in all the studied reserves, being more effective than monoculture tree plantations (de Araújo et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, other hymenopterans like parasitoid wasps and ants are also sensitive to ecosystem degradation and fragmentation (de Sassi and Tylianakis 2012). Since hymenopteran families may have different responses to habitat degradation (Banks et al 2013), they may also have different responses when being monitored in ecological restoration projects, as well as the roles they play in the ecosystem. For instance, bee and parasitoid diversity has been shown to be higher in restored areas than in disturbed ones (Barbieri Junior and Penteado-Dias 2012; Marrec et al 2018) but the species interaction and functions appear to take a longer time to recover (Albrecht et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%