2017
DOI: 10.26717/bjstr.2017.01.000509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Using Allografts in Sciatic Nerve: An Animal Model Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, considering in vivo studies, Tavakoli et al [38] were able to improve functional recovery and morphometric indices of rat sciatic nerve at an I of 0.3 mT (the same intensity used in this work) and a PRF of 2 Hz ( t = 4 h/d for 1-5 days), a value that is quite close to the optimal PRF range found in our study. Also, Kanje et al [36] also fostered rat sciatic nerve regeneration at an I of 0.3 mT and a PRF of 2 Hz (4 h/d for 1-4 days).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, considering in vivo studies, Tavakoli et al [38] were able to improve functional recovery and morphometric indices of rat sciatic nerve at an I of 0.3 mT (the same intensity used in this work) and a PRF of 2 Hz ( t = 4 h/d for 1-5 days), a value that is quite close to the optimal PRF range found in our study. Also, Kanje et al [36] also fostered rat sciatic nerve regeneration at an I of 0.3 mT and a PRF of 2 Hz (4 h/d for 1-4 days).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…PEMF output I was set for the system generator and equal to 0.3 mT (correspoding to a magnetic field strength of 240 A/m), and experimentally verified at the coil center ( x = 0; y = 0; z = 5 mm) with a calibrated probe (100A and 100D, Beehive Electronics). This I value was frequently adopted in the state-of-the-art [36][37][38][39] .…”
Section: Pemf Hardware and Stimulation Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%