2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/5690569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Qigong Therapy on the Anaerobic Threshold in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: Objective. This study aims to identify whether Qigong (QG) rehabilitation therapy can significantly improve the cardiac function of patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) compared with routine therapy. Thus, a randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the curative effects of a three-month QG rehabilitation therapy on cardiac rehabilitation. Patients and Methods. In this trial, a total of 68 patients with SCAD were randomly divided into the QG group (34 patients) and the control (CON) g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, 10 original research articles were selected for further analysis. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The value of Kappa calculated for the various parameters extracted by the 2 investigators was 0.81 (P < .001), indicating an excellent degree of inter-investigator agreement.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, 10 original research articles were selected for further analysis. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The value of Kappa calculated for the various parameters extracted by the 2 investigators was 0.81 (P < .001), indicating an excellent degree of inter-investigator agreement.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[25,26,29,31–33] Moreover, all studies had a high risk of attrition bias on blinding of therapist and participants. Additionally, [25–34] all studies had a low risk of attrition bias on incomplete outcome data, incomplete outcome data, and other sources of bias. [25–34]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations