2006
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.74.011507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of quenching rate and viscosity on spinodal decomposition

Abstract: Spinodal decomposition of deeply quenched mixtures is studied experimentally, with particular emphasis on the domain growth rate during the late stage of coarsening. We provide some experimental evidence that at high Péclet number, the process is isotropic and the domain growth is linear in time, even at finite quenching rates. In fact, the quenching rate appears to influence the magnitude of the growth rate, but not its scaling law. In the second part of the work we analyze the effect of viscosity on the grow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

7
35
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for such difference in the two otherwise very similar experiments remains unclear, but most likely it is due to the difference in the mixture used. It is worth mentioning however that even for the critical composition mixture we have not seen (using an experimental set-up not described in the paper) a dendritic structure, contrary to what we have seen in our previous work [28]. There may be several reasons for that:…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…The reason for such difference in the two otherwise very similar experiments remains unclear, but most likely it is due to the difference in the mixture used. It is worth mentioning however that even for the critical composition mixture we have not seen (using an experimental set-up not described in the paper) a dendritic structure, contrary to what we have seen in our previous work [28]. There may be several reasons for that:…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Our main experimental result is that the droplet selfpropels around and its radius shrinks with a t 1 scaling, instead of the typical t 1=2 fingerprint of a purely diffusive process (linear or nonlinear diffusion equation neglecting convective terms). The t 1 scaling can only be explained as a consequence of hydrodynamic convective effects due to the motion of the droplet [11,13,18]. Since no flow nor pressure, temperature, nor concentration gradients are present in the background phase B, the droplet motion must be self-generated by dissolution dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To allow visualization, 50 ppm of crystal violet (that preferentially mixes with acetone) are added. Crystal violet is a cationic emulsifier, but at such low concentration it has no effect on the solubility limits [13]. We inject a droplet of either pure hexadecane H or phase A into phase B and observe its time evolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations