2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of race, visual anonymity, and social category salience on online dating outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to other forms of online-based interactions, Tinder lacks the majority of non-verbal communicative cues, leading individuals to focus on elements such as users' pictures or names, features that more commonly reveal a person's ethnic background, to determine their degree of similarity (Alhabash, Hales, Baek, & Oh, 2014;Hitsch, Hortaçsu, & Ariely, 2010). This raises the question what happens when people are presented with a Tinder profile of someone outside their own ethnic group.…”
Section: Dating In the Age Of Tindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to other forms of online-based interactions, Tinder lacks the majority of non-verbal communicative cues, leading individuals to focus on elements such as users' pictures or names, features that more commonly reveal a person's ethnic background, to determine their degree of similarity (Alhabash, Hales, Baek, & Oh, 2014;Hitsch, Hortaçsu, & Ariely, 2010). This raises the question what happens when people are presented with a Tinder profile of someone outside their own ethnic group.…”
Section: Dating In the Age Of Tindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social identity theory, proposed by Turner (1979, 1986), posits that people have a social identity (in addition to a personal identity), constituted from group memberships, that affects their self-concept. Social identity, likewise, regulates online identity and outcomes from social media (Akhilesh, Sindhuja, & Kahai, 2013;Alhabash, Hales, Baek, & Oh, 2014) and virtual contexts (Behm-Morawitz & Schipper, 2015;Boellstorff, 2008). Individuals are motivated, both online and offline, to maintain a positive social identity, which is derived from advantageous comparisons made between their ingroup and outgroup (i.e., the comparison focuses on the ingroup's positive identifiers and the outgroup's negative identifiers).…”
Section: Social Identity Theory In An Interactive Media Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defendant race was manipulated by including a color photograph [matched in a pilot study (N = 30) on perceived age, likeability, and attractiveness] of the defendant, along with varying his name (Charles Smith for the White defendant and Jamaal Washington for the Black defendant) to strengthen our race manipulation. Previous research has used names to manipulate race (e.g., Bertrand and Mullainathan, 2004;Widner and Chicoine, 2011;Alhabash et al, 2014), as names can reinforce racial stereotypes and elicit biased judgments (Bodenhausen and Wyer, 1985;Watson et al, 2011;Garcia and Abascal, 2016). In half of the transcripts, an expert witness specializing in confession research testified for the Defense.…”
Section: Trial Transcriptmentioning
confidence: 99%