1957
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859600036133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of radioactive phosphate fertilizers on yield and phosphorus uptake by ryegrass in pot experiments on calcareous soils from Rothamsted

Abstract: 1. Two factorial pot experiments with ryegrass grown on calcareous soils from adjacent long-term experiments on Hoosfield, Rothamsted, are described. The effects of the method of application of phosphate, of the amounts of saP tested and of the level of phosphate applied are discussed with special reference to the manurial history of the soils.2. Yield and total phosphorus uptake by ryegrass were slightly greater in the early stages of growth when superphosphate was applied as a powder than when an equal amoun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1958
1958
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First is the direct, but expensive, method using 32 P‐labeled fertilizer, which has limited applicability because of the short half‐life of the labeled fertilizer. In field experiments at Rothamsted with 32 P, average P recovery ranged only from 5 to 25% (Mattingly, 1957; Mattingly and Widdowson, 1958a, 1958b). Second is the difference method, where percentage P recovery of added P, is calculated as follows: [(UpUo)/Fp]×100 where U p and U o are the uptake of P by crops with and without added P, respectively, and F p is the amount of P applied.…”
Section: Efficient Use Of Phosphorus In Crop Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First is the direct, but expensive, method using 32 P‐labeled fertilizer, which has limited applicability because of the short half‐life of the labeled fertilizer. In field experiments at Rothamsted with 32 P, average P recovery ranged only from 5 to 25% (Mattingly, 1957; Mattingly and Widdowson, 1958a, 1958b). Second is the difference method, where percentage P recovery of added P, is calculated as follows: [(UpUo)/Fp]×100 where U p and U o are the uptake of P by crops with and without added P, respectively, and F p is the amount of P applied.…”
Section: Efficient Use Of Phosphorus In Crop Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Hoosfield Exhaustion Land experiment residues from superphosphate applied between 1856 and 1901 more than doubled yields of barley 50 years later (Warren, 1956;Warren & Johnston, 1960). About one-third of the residual phosphate in these soils remains isotopically-exchangeable (Mattingly, 1957). Long-term field experiments are too few to assess with reasonable precision the residual value of phosphate fertilizers on different soil types.…”
Section: Residual Effects Of Phosphate Fertilizersmentioning
confidence: 99%