2019
DOI: 10.1080/21622965.2019.1585247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness deficits on the reading ability of Arabic-speaking elementary students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of existing explanatory models shows differences among various languages. Linguistic diversity in the field of phonetics and spelling allows us to find similarities in Finnish and Hungarian models (based on the grapheme/phoneme correspondence) and profound differences in languages with spelling systems with a lower degree of consistency, such as French (Ziegler et al, 2010), Arabic (Gharaibeh et al, 2019), Sinhala (Wijaythilake et al, 2018), Bulgarian (Shtereva, 2014), and Chinese (Wang et al, 2015; Yang et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of existing explanatory models shows differences among various languages. Linguistic diversity in the field of phonetics and spelling allows us to find similarities in Finnish and Hungarian models (based on the grapheme/phoneme correspondence) and profound differences in languages with spelling systems with a lower degree of consistency, such as French (Ziegler et al, 2010), Arabic (Gharaibeh et al, 2019), Sinhala (Wijaythilake et al, 2018), Bulgarian (Shtereva, 2014), and Chinese (Wang et al, 2015; Yang et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, reading accuracy as dependent variable was not taken into account in this study. Therefore, it was not possible to determine whether the contributions of NS and PA as measured in this study were truly independent (Gharaibeh et al, 2019). Tibi and Kirby (2019) investigated the cognitive and linguistic processes that underlie reading in Arabic-speaking children from Grade 3, who were administered measures of vocabulary, PA, NS, OP, morphological awareness, nonverbal ability, and five reading outcomes including word-and text-level skills (i.e., word and pseudoword accuracy, word-and text-reading fluency and comprehension).…”
Section: Tdh In Dyslexiamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Similar patterns of findings were also reported in Arabic-based studies. For example, Gharaibeh et al (2019) investigated the effects of PA and NS on reading ability, including word and pseudoword identification and comprehension, in Arabic-speaking third-grade students. Students with a NS deficit scored lower than the no-deficit group, as did both the PA deficit and dyslexia groups, suggesting that phonological and NS skills make distinct contributions to reading ability.…”
Section: The Ddh Of Dyslexiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As summarized by many reviews and meta-analyses ( Denckla and Cutting, 1999 ; Kirby et al, 2010 ; Norton and Wolf, 2012 ), the role of different versions of the RAN in predicting reading outcomes and in discerning between non-impaired and impaired readers emerged both for shallow ( Di Filippo et al, 2005 ; Heikkilä et al, 2009 ; Jones et al, 2009 , 2016 ; Lervåg and Hulme, 2009 ; Moll and Landerl, 2009 ; Torppa et al, 2013 ; Zoccolotti et al, 2013 ; Tobia and Marzocchi, 2014 ; Rodríguez et al, 2015 ) and deep orthographies ( Savage et al, 2007 ; Arnell et al, 2009 ; Georgiou et al, 2011 ; Vander Stappen et al, 2020 ), as well as in non-alphabetic languages ( Yan et al, 2013 ; Pan and Shu, 2014 ; Georgiou and Parrila, 2020 ; Gharaibeh et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%