2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of raw material moisture content, densification pressure and temperature on some properties of Norway spruce pellets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
73
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
10
73
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Seki et al (2016) used 33 to 218 MPa extrusion force to form wood flow obtained using wood impregnated with low-molecular weight phenol formaldehyde (PF) resin. Rhén et al (2005) used high pressure (46 to 114 MPa) combined with temperature (26 to 144 °C) and moisture content (6.3% to 14.7%) to form Norway spruce sawdust pellets. It was found that high compression strength was strongly correlated with the density of the pellets obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seki et al (2016) used 33 to 218 MPa extrusion force to form wood flow obtained using wood impregnated with low-molecular weight phenol formaldehyde (PF) resin. Rhén et al (2005) used high pressure (46 to 114 MPa) combined with temperature (26 to 144 °C) and moisture content (6.3% to 14.7%) to form Norway spruce sawdust pellets. It was found that high compression strength was strongly correlated with the density of the pellets obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, they found that materials with higher moisture and larger particle sizes reduce the unit and bulk density of the product, while higher process temperatures and pressures increase the unit and bulk density. Rhen et al (2005) also found a strong correlation between unit density and compression strength (i.e., high dry density corresponds to high compression strength). Tumuluru et al (2010a), in their article on pelleting DDGS, supported the conclusions that both unit and bulk density greatly depends on feed moisture and die temperature where a maximum density of 1200 kg/m 3 is achievable at temperatures of about 100°C and feed moisture content of about 5-7%.…”
Section: Unit Density (Kg/m 3 )mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Several researchers have found that these parameters are greatly influenced by the material's moisture content and particle size, and the process pressure and temperature (Mani et al, 2006;Rhen et al, 2005;Shankar and Bandyopadhyay, 2005). Generally, they found that materials with higher moisture and larger particle sizes reduce the unit and bulk density of the product, while higher process temperatures and pressures increase the unit and bulk density.…”
Section: Unit Density (Kg/m 3 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the differences in the force at break (Table 1), Rhén et al (2005) note that the compressive strength is directly influenced by the MC. However, in this case no differences are observed in the MC between both types of pellets ( Table 1), indicating that other factors may be affecting the mechanical resistance.…”
Section: Table 5 Pellet Consumption Rates Characteristics Of the Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation of the density profiles of the pellets in the longitudinal and transversal directions (Table 4, Figure 1) is a consequence of the size of the particles conforming them, of the internal structure of their materials and of the temperature and pressure applied to them during the pelletisation process (Rhén et al, 2005). Concerning this, some studies suggest that the smaller the size of the particles or the size of the particles not uniform, the greater is the density of the pressing temperature and the applied pressure are the factors possibly affect the variation of density (Husain et al, 2002;Rhén et al, 2005;Gilbert et al, 2009;Lehtikangas, 2001;Larsson et al, 2008;Bergstrom et al, 2008;Serrano et al, 2011). Thus, variations in these factors are likely to cause variation in the density profile of the pellets evaluated.…”
Section: Pellet Density Measured By X-ray Densitometrymentioning
confidence: 99%