Effects of realistic stress and procedural interference in experimental lie detection.

Kugelmass, Sol; Lieblich, Israel

doi:10.1037/h0023324

Cited by 56 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Initially, these methods were developed mostly by practitioners and were not subjected to a rigorous scientific investigation. But during the second half of the 20th century, the idea of using physiological measures for detecting deception has gradually attracted researchers' attention, primarily of psychophysiologists (e.g., Gustafson & Orne, , , ; Kugelmass & Lieblich, ; Kugelmass, Lieblich, & Bergman, ; Lykken, , ; Podlesny & Raskin, , ). More recently, developments in cognitive neuroscience and modern neuroimaging techniques have also contributed to this increased popularity (for a review of recent research, see Ben‐Shakhar, ; Rosenfeld, Ben‐Shakhar, & Ganis, ).…”

Section: Psychophysiological Methods Of Deception Detectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Memory detection with the Concealed Information Test: A meta analysis of skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, and P300 data

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Concealed Information Test (CIT) uses psychophysiological measures to determine the presence or absence of crime-related information in a suspect's memory. We conducted a meta-analysis on the validity of the CIT based on four physiological measures-skin conductance response (SCR), respiration line length (RLL), changes in heart rate (HR), and enhanced amplitudes of the P300 component of the event-related potential (P300). This meta-analysis relied on laboratory studies that used either the mock-crime or the personal-item paradigm. Results showed a mean effect size (d*) of 1.55 for SCR, 1.11 for RLL, 0.89 for HR, and 1.89 for P300. However, P300 outperformed SCR only in the personal-item paradigm, but not in the mock-crime paradigm. Motivation level, number of questions, publication year, and the inclusion of innocent participants emerged as significant moderators for the SCR, while only the type of paradigm used moderated the P300 effect.

show abstract

Section: Psychophysiological Methods Of Deception Detectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Memory detection with the Concealed Information Test: A meta analysis of skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, and P300 data

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similarly, the Kugelmass and Lieblich (1966) study with police cadets may be seen as threatening a loss of promotion. A realistic, ethically acceptable paradigm is needed for creating threat of punishment in laboratory studies of deception.…”

Section: The Deceptive Contextmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Kuglemass and his co-workers (Kugelmass & Lieblich, 1966;Kugelmass, Note 5) have studied interference of the cardio cuff with SRR differential responsivity during deception. Their findings have indicated that interference may occur in noncriminal subjects; but when a card test was presented during criminal investigations, significant detection of information was obtained both with and without the cuff.…”

Section: Electrodermal Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physiological measures and the detection of deception.

Podlesny¹,

Raskin²

1977

Psychological Bulletin

147

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Laboratory research on physiological measures for detecting deception is reviewed and evaluated. The general problems encountered in making inferences about truth and deception from physiological recordings are described, and various methods for designing tests of deception are explained and evaluated in light of these problems. The review concludes that a number of cardiovascular, electrodermal, and respiratory measures have been shown to be effective in discriminating between truth and deception. Other promising measures are identified, along with suggestions for conducting laboratory research that will be maximally generalizable to field applications of detection of deception.Deception may be defined as an act or state designed to conceal or distort the truth for the purpose of misleading others. Psychophysiological detection of deception (FDD) is a method of determining if a subject is attempting deception and analyzes physiological activity manifested by that subject in response to a series of questions or other stimuli presented to him. In the typical real-life (field) situation, one or more persons are suspected of having committed certain acts or of having possession of information concerning a crime or similar incident. All of the suspects have denied involvement, and the problem is to determine which, if any, of the suspects are attempting deception. The goal of FDD is to achieve a high degree of accuracy of inferences concerning a subject's deceptive status.

show abstract

“…Second, two studies (Kugelmass and Lieblich, 1966; Bradley and Janisse, 1981) manipulated the level of stress experienced by subjects while taking the CIT and included levels that seem to resemble realistic situations. Both studies demonstrated that the level of stress had no effect on the outcomes of the CIT.…”

Section: Weaknesses and Potential Limitations Of The Citmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Both studies demonstrated that the level of stress had no effect on the outcomes of the CIT. It was concluded that, “within a considerable range of stress no necessary decrease in the detection efficiency of the GSR channel need be expected” (Kugelmass and Lieblich, 1966, p. 215). Thus, on the basis of these two studies it seems that detection efficiency estimated in laboratory experiments can be generalized to situations characterized by much higher levels of motivation and stress.…”

Section: Weaknesses and Potential Limitations Of The Citmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current Research and Potential Applications of the Concealed Information Test: An Overview

Ben‐Shakhar¹

2012

Front. Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research interest in psychophysiological detection of deception has significantly increased since the September 11 terror attack in the USA. In particular, the concealed information test (CIT), designed to detect memory traces that can connect suspects to a certain crime, has been extensively studied. In this paper I will briefly review several psychophysiological detection paradigms that have been studied, with a focus on the CIT. The theoretical background of the CIT, its strength and weaknesses, its potential applications as well as research finings related to its validity (based on a recent meta-analytic study), will be discussed. Several novel research directions, with a focus on factors that may affect CIT detection in realistic settings (e.g., memory for crime details; the effect of emotional stress during crime execution) will be described. Additionally, research focusing on mal-intentions and attempts to detect terror networks using information gathered from groups of suspects using both the standard CIT and the searching CIT will be reviewed. Finally, implications of current research to the actual application of the CIT will be discussed and several recommendations that can enhance the use of the CIT will be made.

show abstract

Effects of realistic stress and procedural interference in experimental lie detection.

Cited by 56 publications

References 3 publications

Memory detection with the Concealed Information Test: A meta analysis of skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, and P300 data

Memory detection with the Concealed Information Test: A meta analysis of skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, and P300 data

Physiological measures and the detection of deception.

Current Research and Potential Applications of the Concealed Information Test: An Overview

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About