Recent experimental evidence presented by Rallis and Jawurek (1 ) have convincingly demonstrated that the latent heat transport contribution to the total heat flux in saturated pool boiling is significant even in the low flux region of isolated bubbles. For example if the critical heat flux for water boilin at atmospheric pressure is taken as cal flux, their data indicate the latent eat transport contribution to be 50% of the total flux. As a result, additional importance is given to the investigation of the parameters necessary for the prediction of the latent heat transport contribution.The energy transported away from a heated surface by vapor bubbles may be expressed as where N refers to the number of simultaneously active sites. f s is the frequency of bubble formation at a specific site, and in terms of the individual bubbles formed at that site is given by where 7~ refers to the number of bubbles formed at a specific site. In similar fashion v d s , the bubble volume at departure at a specific site, is given byIt is apparent from Equation (1) that the quantities requiring investigation are the frequency of bubble formation and departure volume at given sites and the number of simultaneously active sites. The latter has not been considered in this work and so will not be discussed further.
REVIEWFrederkin and Daniels (2) have developed theoretical expressions P or the bubble departure diameter and bubble frequency during film boiling asOn the basis of these expressions, the kinematic equation describing the vapor removal process by gravity for film boiling isThe volumetric vapor flow rate per cross section is (7) and the volumetric vapor flow rate is Kinematic expressions similar to Equation (6) have been proposed by Cole (3) for the region of the maximum heat flux in nucleate boiling and by McFadden and Grassmann ( 4 ) for the isolated bubble region in nucleate boiling.Expressions similar to Equation (7) for the volumetric flow rate per cross section have been proposed by Jakob and Linke ( 5 ) , Fritz and Ende ( 6 ) , and Zuber (7) for the isolated bubble region in nucleate boiling, and by Zuber ( 8 ) for the minimum heat flux region in film boiling. Zuber (8) has also proposed an expression for the volumetric flow rate per cross section at the maximum heat flux in nucleate boiling which differs from Equation (7) :Rallis and Jawurek (1) have determined from experiment that the volumetric vapor flow rate for the isolated bubble region in nucleate boiling is a function of both pressure and heat flux.A variety of expressions have been proposed for the departure diameter in the isolated bubble region of nucleate boiling. Variations of Equation (4) are those of where the effect of contact angle is included, and of Cole (10)where the effect of system pressure is considered. Both