2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01314-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of reinforcement ratio on seismic performance of hypothetical stations determined by full-scale central column tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The moment atop the central column closely aligns with the negative value of the moment at the bottom in box‐type stations. Meanwhile, the soil arch did not form for shallow‐buried subway stations when the buried depth was less than 8 m, 42 and the vertical loads imposed on the central columns were mainly influenced by the gravity of overlying soil layers 35,36 . Figure 9 shows that the axial compression of tested columns in Models A, B, and C does not change significantly when the peak acceleration of horizontal motions reaches 0.6 g. The seismic responses of the proposed shallow‐buried stations indicate that: (1) the inflection point of the central column is near its middle point and (2) the vertical load of the central column is mostly determined by the buried depth of the overburdened soil.…”
Section: Hybrid Simulation Of Subway Stationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The moment atop the central column closely aligns with the negative value of the moment at the bottom in box‐type stations. Meanwhile, the soil arch did not form for shallow‐buried subway stations when the buried depth was less than 8 m, 42 and the vertical loads imposed on the central columns were mainly influenced by the gravity of overlying soil layers 35,36 . Figure 9 shows that the axial compression of tested columns in Models A, B, and C does not change significantly when the peak acceleration of horizontal motions reaches 0.6 g. The seismic responses of the proposed shallow‐buried stations indicate that: (1) the inflection point of the central column is near its middle point and (2) the vertical load of the central column is mostly determined by the buried depth of the overburdened soil.…”
Section: Hybrid Simulation Of Subway Stationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…21,60 Therefore, the lower portion of the internal column was selected as the physical substructure for the subsequent hybrid simulations, while the rest of the model was selected as the numerical substructure, as shown in Figure 10. 35…”
Section: Substructuring Technique Of Rectangular Subway Stationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations