2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2021.203996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of reinforcing fibers on airborne particle emissions from brake pads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Song et al [12] have stated the strong, proportional relationship between the mass concentrations and the number of airborne PM with the wear rate of brake pads and discs. Nogueira et al [13] demonstrated that the PM emissions mainly consist of the disrupted friction layer that is dynamically forming during the testing duration from the compaction of the wear debris, with a substantial contribution from the cast iron counterface disc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song et al [12] have stated the strong, proportional relationship between the mass concentrations and the number of airborne PM with the wear rate of brake pads and discs. Nogueira et al [13] demonstrated that the PM emissions mainly consist of the disrupted friction layer that is dynamically forming during the testing duration from the compaction of the wear debris, with a substantial contribution from the cast iron counterface disc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of steel fibers is known to improve the performance of several aspect of brake pads such as helping to remove heat from the contact interface [5,6] and creating primary contact plateaus [7,8]. Although several studies have reported that introducing steel fibers or increasing their content led to high wear of the contact [9][10][11], other studies have shown mixed results regarding this matter [6,12,13]. Non-metal NAO formulations are often limited to low or moderate temperature use, due to the degradation of the organic resin matrix and aramid fibers which happens between 200 and 600 • C [14][15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A and B ) for this pad formulation. These differences in particle generation and charged aerosol properties between the two brake pad types are likely due to morphological differences on the brake pad surface ( 45 ) as well differences in composition, specifically in metals ( 46 ). Differences in the electronic work functions of the materials used in each brake pad could drive differences in the amount of charge that accumulates on the pad surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%