1987
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90159-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of repeated as compared to single aggressive confrontation on nociception and defense behavior in C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No evidence for conditioned analgesia was found insofar as the comparison between baseline and postconfrontation values on Day 2 did not yield a significant difference (baseline: M = 1.86, interquartile range = 1.18−2.15; after confrontation: M = 1.97, interquartile range = 1.43−2.32). Absence of a conditioned social-conflict-induced analgesia has also been shown in the hot-plate assay (Külling, Frischknecht, Pasi, Waser, & Siegfried, 1987) and supports results of other researchers who failed to find a conditioned response after stress-induced analgesia (e.g., Kameyama, Nabeshima, & Yamada, 1985; Ross & Randich, 1984). On the other hand, these studies are in contrast to a number of reports that showed that originally neutral stimuli acquired the capacity to inhibit pain when paired with aversive analgesia-inducing stimuli (Chance et al, 1977; Fanselow & Bolles, 1979; MacLennan et al, 1980; Oliverio & Castellano, 1982).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…No evidence for conditioned analgesia was found insofar as the comparison between baseline and postconfrontation values on Day 2 did not yield a significant difference (baseline: M = 1.86, interquartile range = 1.18−2.15; after confrontation: M = 1.97, interquartile range = 1.43−2.32). Absence of a conditioned social-conflict-induced analgesia has also been shown in the hot-plate assay (Külling, Frischknecht, Pasi, Waser, & Siegfried, 1987) and supports results of other researchers who failed to find a conditioned response after stress-induced analgesia (e.g., Kameyama, Nabeshima, & Yamada, 1985; Ross & Randich, 1984). On the other hand, these studies are in contrast to a number of reports that showed that originally neutral stimuli acquired the capacity to inhibit pain when paired with aversive analgesia-inducing stimuli (Chance et al, 1977; Fanselow & Bolles, 1979; MacLennan et al, 1980; Oliverio & Castellano, 1982).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, for specific behaviors, some strains are more useful than others. For example, in mice, DBA/2 is an aggressive strain while C57BL/6 is not [116]. If expression of a gene is hypothesized to reduce resident-intruder aggression, it might be best to knock it down in a relatively unaggressive strain, such as C57BL/6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attack parameters and the time course for defeat-induced swim suppression observed in the present study were therefore very similar to those of defeat analgesia in DBA/2 mice. It is interesting that strains of mice that show defeat analgesia have very different responses to attack than strains in which defeat analgesia is not observed [Kulling et al, 1987]. Compared with C57s, a strain that does not show defeat analgesia, DBAs display higher probabilities of escape responses (as opposed to upright defenses) on initial attack by a conspecific [Kulling et al, 1987].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting that strains of mice that show defeat analgesia have very different responses to attack than strains in which defeat analgesia is not observed [Kulling et al, 1987]. Compared with C57s, a strain that does not show defeat analgesia, DBAs display higher probabilities of escape responses (as opposed to upright defenses) on initial attack by a conspecific [Kulling et al, 1987]. However, as attacks persist, mice of the DBA/2 strain display strong behavioral passivity that is paralleled by the development of opioid analgesia [Frischknecht and Siegfried, 1988;Rodgers, 1995].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%