2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: This study aims to quantitatively evaluate and summarize the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang databases were searched for randomized controlled trails (RCTs) from their inception through July 10, 2021. RCTs that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study, and RevMan software was used fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the limited number of studies and inconsistent follow-up period, this result should be interpreted carefully, and more evidence is required for its confirmation. In addition, no significant advantage of rTMS over sham has been found for improving fatigue, in line with Chen et al ( 26 ) meta-analysis. In stratified analyses for the outcome of spasticity, a beneficial effect was observed for HF-rTMS application for SP MS in trials with the proportion of females >50% and in trials in which rTMS application was combined with rehabilitation training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Due to the limited number of studies and inconsistent follow-up period, this result should be interpreted carefully, and more evidence is required for its confirmation. In addition, no significant advantage of rTMS over sham has been found for improving fatigue, in line with Chen et al ( 26 ) meta-analysis. In stratified analyses for the outcome of spasticity, a beneficial effect was observed for HF-rTMS application for SP MS in trials with the proportion of females >50% and in trials in which rTMS application was combined with rehabilitation training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As the participant retention rate was high throughout the trial (90%–95%), it is unlikely that AEs went unreported or undetected. None of the AEs were classified as related to rTMS, suggesting that our novel rTMS protocol is safe for people with MS, consistent with safety reporting from prior studies that delivered different rTMS protocols to people with MS. 7 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would complement recent evidence for the efficacy of frequency-specific NIBS in treating fatigue ( Lefaucheur et al, 2017 ). NIBS showed promising results in MS and FMS fatigue ( Lefaucheur et al, 2017 , Ayache et al, 2022 , Chen et al, 2022 ) and was recently proposed as a treatment for long COVID ( Linnhoff et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%