2012
DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2012.614.617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Replacing Maize with Yam Peel Meal on Short Term Laying Performance of Japanese Quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Henday and hen-house egg production of 63.24 to 84.14 recorded in this research were identical because there was no mortality during the experimental period and the values agreed with the recommendation of Randall and Bolla [5], who opined that 70 to 80% is good for the farmer. The result was higher than 40 to 68.28% reported by Ghazvinian and others [24], 16.19 to 30.06% [1] and 16.51 to 29.5% reported by Ijaiya and others [23]; similar to that of [3], who reported Hen-day egg production values of 69.60 to 86.33% and lower than 83.5 to 89.0 reported by [25]. Though there was no significant difference, hen-day egg production of birds on 160.00g/kg inclusion of MFRM recording the lowest value of 63.24% and the (T3) with 80.00g/kg inclusion of MFRM recorded the highest value of 84.14% (HDEP).…”
Section: Laying Performance Of Japanese Quailcontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Henday and hen-house egg production of 63.24 to 84.14 recorded in this research were identical because there was no mortality during the experimental period and the values agreed with the recommendation of Randall and Bolla [5], who opined that 70 to 80% is good for the farmer. The result was higher than 40 to 68.28% reported by Ghazvinian and others [24], 16.19 to 30.06% [1] and 16.51 to 29.5% reported by Ijaiya and others [23]; similar to that of [3], who reported Hen-day egg production values of 69.60 to 86.33% and lower than 83.5 to 89.0 reported by [25]. Though there was no significant difference, hen-day egg production of birds on 160.00g/kg inclusion of MFRM recording the lowest value of 63.24% and the (T3) with 80.00g/kg inclusion of MFRM recorded the highest value of 84.14% (HDEP).…”
Section: Laying Performance Of Japanese Quailcontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Feed intake (22.53 -22.59 g/hen/day) was higher than 13.27 to 22.15g reported by Tuleun and others [3] when Japanese quail hens were fed diets having varying levels of crude protein and 14 to 18 g [5]; similar to the report of Babajide and others [22], who reported daily feed intake of 20.61-22.28 g when Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) were fed diets supplemented with ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol but lower than 29.20 to 30.30 g when Japanese quail hens were fed varying protein and energy levels and 27.32 to 29.84 g, reported before [23]. It was also less than the report of Edache and others [1]. Henday and hen-house egg production of 63.24 to 84.14 recorded in this research were identical because there was no mortality during the experimental period and the values agreed with the recommendation of Randall and Bolla [5], who opined that 70 to 80% is good for the farmer.…”
Section: Laying Performance Of Japanese Quailmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The incorporation of these alternative feedstuffs in poultry rations would help to mitigate the problem of feed shortages and extortionate prices resulting from seasonal production and high demand for traditional feedstuffs such as maize and soybean due to strong rivalry between humans, livestock and industries for their use (Agbabiaka, Madubuike, Ekenyem, & Esonu, 2013;Abd El-Hack, Alagawany, Farag, & Dhama, 2015). Thus, research interest in optimizing the use of fairly inexpensive and readily accessible agro by-products, such as yam peel to formulate poultry feeds, has been intensified in an attempt to minimize feed production costs (Edache, Yisa, & Okpala, 2012;Olajide, 2014;Aguihe, Kehinde, Ilaboya, Abidoye, & Iyayi, 2015;Diarra, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%