2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12937-020-00548-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of resistant starch interventions on circulating inflammatory biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: Purpose: This study aimed to summarize earlier studies on the effects of RS consumption on the serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers. Methods: A comprehensive search was done in the electronic databases that published from 1988 up to May 2019. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. We used from the effect size, as estimated by the mean difference to perform the fixed method meta-analysis. Results:Overall, 13 studies with 14 effect sizes met the inclusio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…If neuroinflammation is involved in the pathogenesis of hydrocephalus, inflammatory markers may serve as novel disease biomarkers. Modulation of inflammatory pathways affects a range of systemic illnesses [59,60] and may well serve as potential targets for pharmacological management of hydrocephalus. We reviewed the results presented in 22 studies, which investigated the presence of 58 inflammatory markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If neuroinflammation is involved in the pathogenesis of hydrocephalus, inflammatory markers may serve as novel disease biomarkers. Modulation of inflammatory pathways affects a range of systemic illnesses [59,60] and may well serve as potential targets for pharmacological management of hydrocephalus. We reviewed the results presented in 22 studies, which investigated the presence of 58 inflammatory markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dosages and durations of dietary fiber intervention ranged from 3 g/day to 30 g/day (except for one study, which used guar gum at 15 mg/day, and another study that used brown rice at 225 g/d), and 4 to 13 weeks, respectively. Twenty-two meta-analyses were performed in China ( 23 , 25 27 , 29 31 , 35 37 , 42 , 43 , 45 , 49 , 51 , 53 56 , 69 71 ), six in Iran ( 24 , 32 34 , 38 , 40 ), four in the UK ( 13 , 39 , 41 , 57 ), one in Australia ( 14 ), eight in Canada ( 44 , 46 , 47 , 50 , 52 , 58 , 62 , 72 ), five in the USA ( 48 , 60 , 65 , 67 , 68 ), one in Brazil ( 59 ), one in Ireland ( 61 ), one in South Africa ( 63 ), one in Italy ( 64 ), one in the Netherlands ( 66 ), and one in Malaysia ( 28 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dietary fiber supplementation has been shown to decrease CRP levels in diabetic individuals [ 111 ], while another recent meta-analysis on the effects of resistant starch interventions on circulating inflammatory biomarkers showed a substantial reduction in the IL-6 and TNF-alpha levels, although no significant changes were found in CRP concentrations [ 112 ]. Additionally, a meta-analysis on low-glycemic-index diets (rich in fiber) reported a significant decrease in IL-6 in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to those with a higher-GI diet [ 113 ].…”
Section: Dietary Carbohydrate Fiber and Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 99%