1990
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100080611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of retinacular release and tibial tubercle elevation in patellofemoral degenerative joint disease

Abstract: Release of the patellar retinaculum and tibial tubercle elevation have both been advocated for the treatment of patellofemoral degeneration. Questions remain, however, regarding the magnitude and predictability of such effects in diseased joints. Using cadaver knee joints exhibiting a range of patellofemoral cartilage degeneration, we investigated the effects on joint contact pressures on release of the patellar retinaculum, followed by tibial tubercle elevations of 1.25 and 2.5 cm. Retinacular release failed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
27
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anterior displacement of the tibial tuberosity reduces the contact forces, but not necessarily the stress on the patellofemoral joint (Lewallen et al 1990). Anteromedialization, which translates the contact area medially, results in relief of the lateral facet which could theoretically reduce pain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anterior displacement of the tibial tuberosity reduces the contact forces, but not necessarily the stress on the patellofemoral joint (Lewallen et al 1990). Anteromedialization, which translates the contact area medially, results in relief of the lateral facet which could theoretically reduce pain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patellofemoral joint load during knee flexion has been reported by several different authors/groups (Reilly and Martens, 1972;Smidt, 1973;Dahlkvist et al, 1982;Singerman et al, 1999;Matthews et al, 1977;Churchill et al, 2001;Townsend et al, 1977;Singerman et al, 1995a, b;Ahmed et al, 1987;Nisell and Ekholm, 1985;Buff et al, 1988;Petersilge et al, 1994;Lewallen et al, 1990). There is a wide variation between these results because the loading of the knee varies.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Reilly and Martens (1972) came to this conclusion after estimating the maximum patellofemoral force to be about 0.5BW during walking. Because it is low, the joint moment during walking can vary significantly based on measurement The equivalent body weight in Singerman et al (1994) is estimated from their own comparison of their work to the work of Lewallen et al (1990). methods and subject-to-subject variation (Manal et al, 2002).…”
Section: Walking Gaitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond 120° of flexion, the contact area is reduced and only the small odd facet remains in contact with the femur. The contact area is approximately 2.1 cm 2 at 30° of flexion and increases to approximately 5.5 cm 2 at 90° of flexion [4, 5]. In addition to the superior and inferior motion of the patella, it also tracks lateral-medial-lateral and tilts laterally during tibiofemoral extension to flexion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%