2010
DOI: 10.1080/03949370903516149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of reversed size-assortative mating on spawning success in the monogamous convict cichlid,Amatitlania nigrofasciata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As observed previously in similar paradigms allowing choice (Leese et al. ), both pairing types spawned successfully in both the group tanks and the observation tanks. Females in female‐larger pairs laid more eggs on average than those in male‐larger pairs (19 ± 15 vs. 9 ± 3 eggs); however, this difference was not statistically significant ( t 7.5 = 1.76, p = 0.12).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As observed previously in similar paradigms allowing choice (Leese et al. ), both pairing types spawned successfully in both the group tanks and the observation tanks. Females in female‐larger pairs laid more eggs on average than those in male‐larger pairs (19 ± 15 vs. 9 ± 3 eggs); however, this difference was not statistically significant ( t 7.5 = 1.76, p = 0.12).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…On the other hand, our finding might be important to understand the dynamics of size-assortative mating in natural populations. Size-assortative mating is a pervasive pattern of mating in natural populations [ 86 ], particularly in monogamous fish species [ 87 - 89 ], including convict cichlids [ 74 , 90 - 92 ]. Although size-assortative mating can be produced independently of active mate choice, either through heterogeneity in spatial [ 93 ] or temporal [ 94 ] distribution of potential mates or through intrasexual competition [ 85 ], active mate choice may contribute to generate the observed patterns of size assortment between mates [ 88 , 95 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%