Abstract:People generally underestimate their own vulnerability to negative events such as illness or accidents. It has been suggested that this illusion of "unique invulnerability" is due to selective focus on one's own risk-reducing behaviors, to the exclusion of others' risk-reducing behaviors and one's own risk-increasing behaviors. The current study examined the effects of reviewing sexual and contraceptive behavior on perceived vulnerability to unplanned pregnancy. Our results indicated that review of pregnancy-r… Show more
“…This finding provides experimental support for the results obtained by Gerrard et al (1991) who used a correlational methodology. Thus, although previous research has indicated that review of risk relevant factors increases optimism (Weinstein, 1983), the results of the present study suggest that it may not be review per se, but review of risk decreasing factors which leads to an increase in perceptions of invulnerability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Research shows that in comparison to a no-review control group, optimism actually increases after review of risk behaviour for a variety of health problems (Weinstein, 1983). For example, Gerrard, Gibbons & Warner, (1991) examined the effects of reviewing both risk increasing behaviour (eg., frequency of sexual intercourse) and risk decreasing behaviour (eg., contraceptive use) on perceived risk to unplanned pregnancy. The results revealed that in comparison to a control group optimism increased after review of behavioural risk factors.…”
Hoppe, R., Ogden, J. (1996). The effect of selectively reviewing behavioural risk factors on HIV risk perception. Psychology and Health, 11, 757-764.The effect of selectively reviewing behavioural risk factors on HIV risk perception
“…This finding provides experimental support for the results obtained by Gerrard et al (1991) who used a correlational methodology. Thus, although previous research has indicated that review of risk relevant factors increases optimism (Weinstein, 1983), the results of the present study suggest that it may not be review per se, but review of risk decreasing factors which leads to an increase in perceptions of invulnerability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Research shows that in comparison to a no-review control group, optimism actually increases after review of risk behaviour for a variety of health problems (Weinstein, 1983). For example, Gerrard, Gibbons & Warner, (1991) examined the effects of reviewing both risk increasing behaviour (eg., frequency of sexual intercourse) and risk decreasing behaviour (eg., contraceptive use) on perceived risk to unplanned pregnancy. The results revealed that in comparison to a control group optimism increased after review of behavioural risk factors.…”
Hoppe, R., Ogden, J. (1996). The effect of selectively reviewing behavioural risk factors on HIV risk perception. Psychology and Health, 11, 757-764.The effect of selectively reviewing behavioural risk factors on HIV risk perception
“…The evidence indicates that individuals' inability to make accurate estimates tends to maintain an illusion of themselves as invulnerable, or they show an optimistic bias (McKenna, 1993;Weinstein, 1980). Studies of perceived vulnerability have demonstrated that people tend to think that they are less vulnerable than others to negative events (Weinstein, 1987;Gerrard, 1991).…”
This research establishes that the consumer's perceived vulnerability to a threat is a relevant variable that modifies the preference for domestic origin products. Many times, consumers balance their personal well-being with their sense of in-group identity, particularly when their preference for domestic products above foreign ones is expected. This study demonstrates that perceived vulnerability to a threat such as damaging one's personal well-being is a relevant factor when consumers express their preference for domestic products.
“…In a similar manner, people have a better memory for behavioral guidelines that place their behavior in a favorable (healthy) light than for those that place it in an unfavorable (unhealthy) light (66). Finally, when asked to consider their own behavioral prac tices, people may selectively focus on the preventive actions that they have adopted rather than on the risks that they have taken [ (53,67); for a complete discussion of these fi ndings, see Gerrard et al, this monograph].…”
Section: Recognizing the Limitations Of A Contextually Based Communicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interventions that heighten the salience of factors that place people at risk for adverse outcomes have typically involved directing their attention to relevant aspects of their behavior or personal attributes. For instance, Gerrard et al (53) had female Marines review their sexual and contraceptive his tories prior to assessing their risks for pregnancy and human immunodefi ciency virus (HIV) infection. Th is behavioral review heightened judgments of personal risk for HIV infection and, in some cases, personal risk for pregnancy.…”
Section: Impact Of Contextualized Approachesmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.