Ab8traetRats with electrodes in either the septal region or anterior cingulate cortex received mild continuous electrical stimulation after having previously mastered a DRL-15 reinforcement contingency. Septal stimulation produced a pronounced disruption in DRL performance. Anterior cingulate stimulation had no deleterious effect, but resulted in a shift to longer interresponse times. Proble ..From the time Kaada (1951) reported differential somato-motor and autonomic effects from stimulating either anterior subcallosal or anterior cingulate areas, investigators have looked for behavioral correlates of these effects. In experiments with lesioned cats, McCleary (1961) found behavioral differences between these two areas in passive and active avoidance tasks, and on the basis of his results he postulated the involvement of the subcallosal cortex (septal area) in a circuit mediating response inhibition. If response inhibition is a general phenomenon in which the septal area plays an integral role, results obtained by using aversive techniques, such as those employed by McCleary, should also hold up for situations involving positive reinforcement. The operant schedule of reinforcement labelled DRL (differential reinforcement of low rates) appears to be an ideal situation for measuring response inhibition, while at the same time eliminating the noxious element. On this reinforcement schedule, S receives a reward only if he has refrained from responding for a predetermined delay period. If he responds during the delay, the timers reset and he will not receive a reward again until he has delayed for the correct length of time .The present experiment, using this operant technique, was designed to further clarify the roles of the septal area and the anterior cingulate cortex in response suppression.
SubjectsSs were l4 experimentally naive male hooded rats: eight with . electrodes implanted in the septal area, and six with electrodes implanted in the anterior cingulate cortex. Proe ..... r@On the sixth day following surgery, Ss were put on a food deprivation schedule. They were given enough food in the form of dry lab blocks, once per day on three consecutive days, for their weights to stabilize to about 85-90% of their free feeding weights. After testing began, each S received three blocks of lab chow following each experimental session. Water was present in the individual home cages at all times, as well as in the testing apparatus during food reinforcement.On the tenth postoperative day, Ss were trained to press a lever in order to obtain a 45 mg pellet of food, and on the following day each S remained on this continuous schedule for 100 lever presses. DRL training commenced on the twelfth postoperative day, and Ss were trained by progressively increasing the delay intervals. Under this P'Ychon. Sci., 1965, Vol. 2.
Joel Kaplan
ALLAN MEMORIAL INSTITUTE, MCGILL UNIJlERSITYprocedure S was started at a 5 sec. delay (DRL-5), an. d was stepped up by 2 sec. increments when he had successfully attained 50% rewarded responses o...