2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of rodent prefrontal lesions on object-based, visual scene memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of neurons in the OFC is modified by a wide range of experiences including social play (e.g., Bell, Pellis, & Kolb, 2010; Burleson et al, 2016; Himmler, Pellis, & Kolb, 2013) and sexual behavior (Fiorino & Kolb, 2003) so we hypothesized that social interaction, and perhaps nonsocial olfactory experience, could modify neuronal morphology in OFC. Although the mPFC does not have a known role in olfactory behavior, it does play a role in certain aspects of play and social behavior (Bell, McCaffrey, Forgie, Kolb, & Pellis, 2009; Hamilton et al, 2010; Himmler et al, 2014; Kolb, 1974) and object recognition (Barker, Bird, Alexander, & Warburton, 2007; Chao, Huston, Li, Wang, & de Souza Silva, 2016; DeCoteau, McElvaine, Smolentzov, & Kesner, 2009; Spanswick & Dyck, 2012; but see Ennaceur, Neave, & Aggleton, 1997). Thus, repeated experiences with conspecifics or nonsocial odors could involve recognition processes that engage mPFC neurons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of neurons in the OFC is modified by a wide range of experiences including social play (e.g., Bell, Pellis, & Kolb, 2010; Burleson et al, 2016; Himmler, Pellis, & Kolb, 2013) and sexual behavior (Fiorino & Kolb, 2003) so we hypothesized that social interaction, and perhaps nonsocial olfactory experience, could modify neuronal morphology in OFC. Although the mPFC does not have a known role in olfactory behavior, it does play a role in certain aspects of play and social behavior (Bell, McCaffrey, Forgie, Kolb, & Pellis, 2009; Hamilton et al, 2010; Himmler et al, 2014; Kolb, 1974) and object recognition (Barker, Bird, Alexander, & Warburton, 2007; Chao, Huston, Li, Wang, & de Souza Silva, 2016; DeCoteau, McElvaine, Smolentzov, & Kesner, 2009; Spanswick & Dyck, 2012; but see Ennaceur, Neave, & Aggleton, 1997). Thus, repeated experiences with conspecifics or nonsocial odors could involve recognition processes that engage mPFC neurons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar interpretations are possible for other tasks that included fairly complex conditional relationships among stimuli (Winocur and Eskes 1998;Haddon and Killcross 2006;Lee and Solivan 2008). However, higher-level attention itself does not seem to automatically necessitate the mPFC unless the task is goal directed, because increasing the number of objects in a spontaneous object exploration task did not result in any performance deficit in mPFC-lesioned animals (Granon et al 1996), whereas a similar study that required the rats to perform a go/ no-go task for object-based scenes for obtaining reward required the mPFC (DeCoteau et al 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies which provide evidence displaying a flat, or ungraded, retrograde amnesia following hippocampal damage exist as well (Bolhuis and Stewart, 1994;Broadbent et al, 2006;Burwell et al, 2004;Clark et al, 2005aClark et al, ,b, 2007Driscoll et al, 2005;Epp et al, 2008;Gaffan, 1993;Gaskin et al, 2003;Haijima and Ichitani, 2008;Koerner et al, 1996;Lehmann et al, 2007Lehmann et al, , 2013Martin et al, 2005;Mumby et al, 1999;Riedel et al, 1999;Salmon et al, 1987;Sparks et al, 2011;Sutherland et al, 2008;Thornton et al, 1997;Weisand et al, 1996;Wiltgen et al, 2006;Winocur et al, 2005a,b). Similarly, conflicting results exist for the role of the ACC, with some research suggesting that inactivation of the ACC does not impair remote memory storage or retrieval processes (DeCoteau et al, 2009;Oswald et al, 2010).…”
Section: Animal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a number of studies have shown that inactivation of the ACC hinders performance on remote memory tests (Ding et al, 2008;Frankland et al, 2004;Lopez et al, 2012;Maviel et al, 2004;Teixeira et al, 2006) others have shown that inactivation of the ACC does not impair remote memory storage/retrieval (DeCoteau et al, 2009;Oswald et al, 2010). We explored this discrepancy by suggesting that a memory would more fully come to rely on neural ensembles in the ACC when distinct memories were sequentially encoded by overlapping neural ensembles in the hippocampus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%