2012
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2012.704406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of rotation frequency and task order on localised muscle fatigue and performance during repetitive static shoulder exertions

Abstract: Rotation is widely used and assumed to reduce the risk of WMSDs, yet little research supports that it is effective in doing so. Results here show that specific aspects of a rotation scheme may influence muscle fatigue and task performance, though further research is needed under more realistic task conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Previous studies investigating the effect of rotation frequency between lifting of 10% and 20% body weight (Horton et al, 2015), shoulder flexion and abduction (Raina and Dickerson, 2009), and static shoulder exertions at 15% and 30% MVC (Horton et al, 2012) on manifestations of muscle fatigue and perceived fatigue are in line with our findings. Because we clearly saw more development of perceived fatigue in the low compared to the high rotation frequency protocols, the two experimental tasks may not have been different enough in terms of muscle activation patterns, or the effects of the rotation schemes may not have been present yet within 1 h. We considered the EMG variability and its spatial centre of activity parameters because they could be influenced by manifestations of muscle fatigue.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3). Previous studies investigating the effect of rotation frequency between lifting of 10% and 20% body weight (Horton et al, 2015), shoulder flexion and abduction (Raina and Dickerson, 2009), and static shoulder exertions at 15% and 30% MVC (Horton et al, 2012) on manifestations of muscle fatigue and perceived fatigue are in line with our findings. Because we clearly saw more development of perceived fatigue in the low compared to the high rotation frequency protocols, the two experimental tasks may not have been different enough in terms of muscle activation patterns, or the effects of the rotation schemes may not have been present yet within 1 h. We considered the EMG variability and its spatial centre of activity parameters because they could be influenced by manifestations of muscle fatigue.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The EMG indicators of fatigue did not show differences with regard to task order. Thus, based on perceived fatigue, one could argue that task order may be crucial after all, although we cannot directly relate it to the conclusion of Raina andDickerson (2009) andHorton et al (2012) that starting with the more difficult or intense of two tasks results in higher levels of perceived fatigue. On the other hand, based on the EMG indicators of fatigue it seems that order of rotation may not be a very important factor (Keir et al, 2011).…”
Section: Task Ordermentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our search identified 12 studies on tasks that were simulated in the laboratory (Horton et al, 2012;Gooyers and Stevenson, 2012;Bosch et al, 2011;Keir et al, 2011;Wells et al, 2010;Raina and Dickerson, 2009;Iridiastadi and Nussbaum, 2006;Balci and Aghazadeh, 2004;Gerard et al, 2002;McLean et al, 2001;Mathiassen and Winkel, 1996;Sundelin, 1993) and 2 studies on real-life occupational settings (Bosch et al, 2007;Christensen et al, 2000). In general, the laboratory studies had small-sized sample groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is based on the assumption of reducing physical stress of operators by varying the parts of the body that are stressed. However, in practice, it can have the opposite effect and even be harmful to worker health (Comper and Padula, 2014;Luger et al, 2014;Horton et al, 2012;Keir et al, 2011). The protocol put in place in this study does not make it possible to validate this proposal.…”
Section: Anovamentioning
confidence: 82%