Introduction
Wearables have the potential to provide accurate estimates of tissue loads at common running injury locations. Here we investigate the accuracy by which commercially available instrumented insoles (ARION) can predict musculoskeletal loading at common running injury locations.
Methods
19 runners (10 males) ran at five different speeds, four slopes, with different step frequencies, and forward trunk lean on an instrumented treadmill, while wearing instrumented insoles. The insole data was used as input to an artificial neural network that was trained to predict the Achilles tendon strain, and tibia and patellofemoral stress impulses and weighted impulses (damage proxy) determined with musculoskeletal modelling. Accuracy was investigated using leave-one-out cross-validation and correlations. The effect of different input metrics was also assessed.
Results
The neural network predicted tissue loading with overall relative percentage errors of 1.95 ± 8.40, -7.37 ± 6.41, and -12.8 ± 9.44% for the patellofemoral joint, tibia and Achilles tendon impulse, respectively. The accuracy significantly changed with altered running speed, slope, or step frequency. Mean (95% confidence interval) within-individual correlations between modelled and predicted impulses across conditions were generally nearly perfect, being 0.92 (0.89 to 0.94); 0.95 (0.93 to 0.96); and 0.95 (0.94 to 0.96) for the patellofemoral, tibial, and Achilles tendon stress/strain impulses, respectively.
Conclusions
This study shows that commercially available instrumented insoles can predict loading at common running injury locations with variable absolute, but (very) high relative accuracy. The absolute error was lower than methods that measure step-count only, or assume a constant load per speed or slope. This developed model may allow for quantification of in-field tissue loading and real-time tissue loading-based feedback to reduce injury risk.