2014
DOI: 10.14214/sf.1054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of sale-specific factors on stumpage prices in Finland

Abstract: Highlights • Data on 4824 individual sales were used to estimate which factors affect stumpage prices. • The time of sale, seasonal harvest restrictions, the location and the assortment affected prices. • Larger total volumes and shorter forest haulage distances raised unit prices. • A higher percentage of the assortment and percentage of sawlogs within the sale corresponded to higher prices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This easily compensates for the loss of revenue caused by intensified GFFM. Doubling the size of the sales would lead to an increase of about 0.5-1 euro/m 3 in the stumpage price (Kolis et al 2014), which corresponds to about 2-3% of the average stumpage price within the dataset. If the efficiency of operations can be increased, it can cover the costs of increased microsite variation (game spots) and most of the increased average forest cover (longer rotations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This easily compensates for the loss of revenue caused by intensified GFFM. Doubling the size of the sales would lead to an increase of about 0.5-1 euro/m 3 in the stumpage price (Kolis et al 2014), which corresponds to about 2-3% of the average stumpage price within the dataset. If the efficiency of operations can be increased, it can cover the costs of increased microsite variation (game spots) and most of the increased average forest cover (longer rotations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under conditions of instability in the global markets and a considerable decrease in demand in the first half of 2009, the State Forests managed to implement its sales plan, but at somewhat reduced prices. In the same year timber sales in Finland amounted to as little as 16.5 million m 3 as compared to 33.2 million m 3 in 2010, at prices that were lower than in 2008 [59]. Toppinen and Kuuluvainen [60] reported high price elasticity for Finland pulpwood supply, in contrast to France [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best form depends on which is more suitable for your actual situation [58,59]. Previous studies on the stumpage price have generally adopted the linear form of HPM [15,37]. In this paper, the linear form also had a good predictive power, but the model comparison revealed that the double logarithmic form was best suited for our research.…”
Section: Choice Of Hpm Formmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Leefers et al [36], who estimated stumpage prices in the Lake States forests in the United States, found that stumpage prices were aligned with the identities of individual species. In a study of 4824 standing timber sales transactions conducted during the period 2008-2012, Kolis et al [37] analyzed the relationship between stumpage prices and sales-specific factors. Their findings revealed the impacts of seasonal harvest restrictions, sales volumes, timber assortment, and forest damage on stumpage prices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%