2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1016273818726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Salinity and Relative Humidity on Two Melon Cultivars Differing in Salt Tolerance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Negative effects of salinity on crop growth and/or fruit yield were alleviated in melon (An et al, 2002) and tomato (Li et al, 2001) when the plants were grown under high relative humidity, which reduced E compared to standard conditions.…”
Section: Crop Growth and Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative effects of salinity on crop growth and/or fruit yield were alleviated in melon (An et al, 2002) and tomato (Li et al, 2001) when the plants were grown under high relative humidity, which reduced E compared to standard conditions.…”
Section: Crop Growth and Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, among fungal taxa at genus level, the major population at the harvesting stage was Fusarium. Yang et al [46] reported that the muskmelon root exudate functions to stimulate Fusarium oxysporum spore germination and mycelial growth. Plant age as well as plant cultivars, and environmental factors are important factors that affect the composition and quantity of root exudates [47,48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher levels can disrupt transpiration, hindering water and nutrient transport, reducing fruit size and sweetness, and increasing the risk of fungal diseases and pests [36]. Lower humidity levels can cause excessive evaporation, stressing plants and negatively impacting growth and fruit quality [40]. Carbon dioxide, essential for photosynthesis and particularly crucial for fruit development, should be above 1200 ppm to increase fruit size, number, and sugar content [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%