2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of salt concentration on the yield stress of sodium montmorillonite suspension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, this crude approximation shows that the smectite system is essentially controlled by volume exclusion effects. This is consistent with many recent works (Bavarian et al 2003;Sakairi et al 2005), which also indicate that Na-smectite suspensions are stabilized by electrostatic repulsion.…”
Section: Data Interpretation and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Nevertheless, this crude approximation shows that the smectite system is essentially controlled by volume exclusion effects. This is consistent with many recent works (Bavarian et al 2003;Sakairi et al 2005), which also indicate that Na-smectite suspensions are stabilized by electrostatic repulsion.…”
Section: Data Interpretation and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It is commonly understood that the face of a clay particle, such as kaolinite and bentonite, carries permanent negative charges, while the charges carried by the edge are positive at acidic pH and negative at alkaline pH. As a result, the yield stress is mainly determined by the electrostatic double-layer forces between particles [10][11][12][13][14]. For kaolinite suspensions, it is found that the yield stress origins from the edge-to-face electrostatic attractive interaction between particles at a low concentration, while the interaction changes to the face-to-face electrostatic repulsive interaction with increasing concentration of clay [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although repeated measurements on suspensions with solids contents below 4 vol.% were consistent with the observed trends, the viscous character of these systems may lead to measurement uncertainties, especially with regard to viscoelasticity measurements. Such complex behavior regarding the rheological properties of clay minerals as a function of ionic strength and solids content has been noted elsewhere (Abend and Lagaly, 2000;Sakari et al, 2005;Chang and Leong, 2014). Nevertheless, until more detailed measurements are performed, any conclusions made regarding the nature of the suspensions at low solids contents are tenuous at best.…”
Section: Rheological Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 73%