2002
DOI: 10.2307/3802962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Sampling Effort Based on GPS Telemetry on Home-Range Size Estimations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
160
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
160
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy and precision of home range estimates are influenced by the number of locations. Biased estimates and large errors are associated with MCP estimates derived from <10 positions/individual and kernel estimates derived from <15 positions/ individual (Girard et al 2002). Thus, calculation of MCP and maximum distance was restricted to birds with >10 positions recorded.…”
Section: Estimation Of Home Range Size and Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy and precision of home range estimates are influenced by the number of locations. Biased estimates and large errors are associated with MCP estimates derived from <10 positions/individual and kernel estimates derived from <15 positions/ individual (Girard et al 2002). Thus, calculation of MCP and maximum distance was restricted to birds with >10 positions recorded.…”
Section: Estimation Of Home Range Size and Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During caribou captures, however, we did not find caribou in the area between the Moberly and Quintette herds, and other surveys (Seip, 2002) suggest that caribou may be absent from this region. Similarly, other methods of defining seasonal ranges may have yielded different results (Boulanger & White, 1990;Girard et al, 2002) and range overlap may vary depending on herd densities (e.g., spatial overlap may increase at higher densities). Despite limitations in quantifying spatial overlap, our data suggest that spatial overlap or adjacency of herds is not synonymous with ecological overlap.…”
Section: Spatial Separation and Use Of Vegetation-cover Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same birds, the latter authors reported home range sizes (according to MCP) ranging from 45.42 km 2 to 142.66 km 2 (51.30-142.66 km 2 for males and from 45.42 to 134.84 km 2 for females) (Martínez et al 2011). These differences in home range size can be logically accounted for the different tracking methods, indicating that radiotracking tends to underestimate measures of home range size in comparison with unbiased GPS satellite tracking technologies (Girard et al 2002;e.g., García-Ripollés et al 2011;López-López et al 2014a). With regards to sex differences in ranging behaviour, previous studies suggested different levels of space use by males and females, with females tending to range across larger areas than males, particularly during the pre-laying and pre-migratory periods (Díaz-Ruiz and Cebollada-Baratas 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%