“…Moving beyond impeller classifications, different impeller types, including both conventional turbines, whose total diameter typically does not exceed half of the tank diameter and the blade axial extension is limited, and large blade impellers, which are characterized by much higher height and diameter, have been recently compared for evaluating the performances in important applications, such as spherical agglomeration of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), recovery of rare earth minerals by emulsification, and CO 2 hydrate formation for carbon capture. In particular, interesting results were obtained from Chen et al [2] in the case of APIs production using a Maxblend (MB) impeller, which gave the least requirement of agitation speed with respect to single and double pitched blade turbines (PBT), both for the solid-liquid and the liquid-liquid operations taking place for accomplishing the agglomeration. Also, higher selectivity in the recovery of minerals by emulsification, most likely associated with higher shear rate uniformity that gives rise to more uniform droplets in the vessel volume, was obtained with an MB impeller with respect to a PBT by Avazpour et al [3] Extremely efficient formation of CO 2 hydrates in a tank stirred with an MB impeller with the best energy performance compared with other impeller types, probably due to the combination of high pumping capacity, uniform shear field, and good gas-liquid contact, was found by Douïeb et al [4] Besides the above-mentioned examples showing that, depending on the specific design, large blade impellers can provide appropriate flow circulation and good performances in two-phase operations, the hydrodynamics characteristics of these impellers have been investigated in a significantly lower number of cases with respect to traditional fast impellers.…”