1981
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3770(81)90016-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of seasonality and plant density on the productivity of some freshwater macrophytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The net changes of NO 2 -N, NH 3 -N, dON and pON in the medium during the growth were negligible (Table 5). These values are relatively smaller than 9.2 to 11.7 g dw m -2 d -1 , recorded earlier by some workers (Sharma 1990, DeBusk et al 1981, Fitzsimons and Vallejos 1986. Water hyacinth productivity in natural water is generally a function of its density and eutrophic state of the habitat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The net changes of NO 2 -N, NH 3 -N, dON and pON in the medium during the growth were negligible (Table 5). These values are relatively smaller than 9.2 to 11.7 g dw m -2 d -1 , recorded earlier by some workers (Sharma 1990, DeBusk et al 1981, Fitzsimons and Vallejos 1986. Water hyacinth productivity in natural water is generally a function of its density and eutrophic state of the habitat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Using an extrapolated value for productivity at 40 kg wet wt. m -2 from DeBusk et al (1980), similar calculations give crude protein production rates of 3.8 and 2.7 g protein m 2 day-at 10 and 40 kg wet wt. m-2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Lemna is not capable of'3-dimensional' growth as are Eichhornia and Pistia and once cultures become a continuous monolayer, plants cannot grow without overlapping and self-shading. The relationship of growth habit and culture density is also important in explaining differences in the potential productivity of Lemna and Eichhornia (DeBusk et al 1980). As vertical growth of Eichhornia and Pistia increased at higher densities, the proportion of cellwall material required to support this growth increased (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, they reported a 7,500 lux as the optimum light intensity for duckweed growth. Although, the biomass yields of small-leaf floating macrophytes are quite lower than for large-leaf floating aquatic macrophyte such as Eichhornia crassipes or Piscia stratiotes [26], the ability of duckweeds to assimilate nutrients from culture medium has been reported by different authors as comparable [4,27]. …”
Section: Duckweed Growth and Nutrient Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%