2020
DOI: 10.1002/rra.3666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of seining effort and site length on variability of small‐bodied fish catch‐rates in a sand‐bed river

Abstract: Seines are a common sampling gear for monitoring small-bodied fishes in wadeable, sand-bed rivers. However, sampling effort within a site can vary among time and space, even within the same monitoring program. Determining and standardizing an adequate or optimal amount of effort within a site is an important step for designing fisheries monitoring programs. If budgets are limited, sampling intensity at a site is often a trade-off between less intense sampling at a greater number of locations or more intense sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons to randomly selected sites indicated similar fish assemblages and RGS Minnow catch rates (Archdeacon et al 2015). At each site, 18–20 seine hauls (2.5 × 1.0 m; mesh size: ~5 mm) were performed in standardized, discrete mesohabitats to ensure that all habitats available were sampled with enough effort to obtain an adequate representation of the site (Archdeacon et al 2020). Sampling effort was measured by multiplying the length of each seine haul by the width of the seine (typically 2.5 m).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons to randomly selected sites indicated similar fish assemblages and RGS Minnow catch rates (Archdeacon et al 2015). At each site, 18–20 seine hauls (2.5 × 1.0 m; mesh size: ~5 mm) were performed in standardized, discrete mesohabitats to ensure that all habitats available were sampled with enough effort to obtain an adequate representation of the site (Archdeacon et al 2020). Sampling effort was measured by multiplying the length of each seine haul by the width of the seine (typically 2.5 m).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such differences in guilds collected by the different gears indicate that combined methods are needed to make assessments in large river (Seegert, 2000;Goffaux et al, 2004). Catch rates in medium-large rivers are typically 2-3 times higher at night, and as much as 10-fold higher for some species (Simon and Sanders, 1999), and observed species richness is at least partially determined by sampling effort and site length (Smith and Jones, 2005;de Freitas Terra et al, 2013;Archdeacon et al, 2020). So large river sites should be sampled by a combination of night electrofishing (effort S500 m) and seining (sample until no new species are being collected).…”
Section: Sampling Methods and Approaches For Estimating Fish Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish were sampled during each repeat sampling event with seines by conducting 15–20 hauls (3.0 by 1.0 meter net, mesh size 3.2 mm) per site using standard procedures for sampling fish from wadable waters (Archdeacon, Reale, et al, 2020; Rabeni et al, 2009). We recorded the length and width of each haul (0.1 m) to calculate the amount of area sampled.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we assumed the seine hauls were representative of the average density of Red Shiner at each site. The amount of effort, 15–20 hauls per site, was in excess of the amount required to estimate fish densities, including Red Shiner, in the MRG (Archdeacon, Reale, et al, 2020). During the first fish sampling in 15 – 17 June surveys, we used VIE tags to mark Red Shiners >35 mm standard length.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%