2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of selenium on benthic macroinvertebrates and fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) in a boreal lake ecosystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, current Se benchmarks derived based on Se accumulation in fish tissue assume that this threshold is protective of all aquatic biota (British Columbia Ministry of Environment [BCMoE], 2014; ECCC, 2021; US Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA], 2016). Recent studies, however, have demonstrated adverse effects of Se (selenite) on benthic macroinvertebrate richness and density at concentrations below the current Canadian benchmark of 1 µg/L (Graves et al, 2019b). Also, in mine‐influenced streams, benthic macroinvertebrate taxa bioaccumulated the highest Se concentrations among all taxa analyzed, including fish and salamanders (Cianciolo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, current Se benchmarks derived based on Se accumulation in fish tissue assume that this threshold is protective of all aquatic biota (British Columbia Ministry of Environment [BCMoE], 2014; ECCC, 2021; US Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA], 2016). Recent studies, however, have demonstrated adverse effects of Se (selenite) on benthic macroinvertebrate richness and density at concentrations below the current Canadian benchmark of 1 µg/L (Graves et al, 2019b). Also, in mine‐influenced streams, benthic macroinvertebrate taxa bioaccumulated the highest Se concentrations among all taxa analyzed, including fish and salamanders (Cianciolo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the observed decreases in BMI and crustacean zooplankton density/biomass with increasing Se concentrations, we found that chlorophyll a concentrations increased approximately 2‐ to 3‐fold in the highest Se treatment (7.9 µg/L) relative to the controls. This finding suggests that there was no inhibition of algal growth by Se, and rather, that algal growth may have increased either indirectly—as a result of decreased grazing pressure (Graves et al, 2019a)—or directly—as a result of Se supplementation supporting algal growth (Abdel‐Hamid & Skulberg, 1995). In the present study, as well as in a previous study (Graves et al, 2019a), invertebrate biomass decreased in the higher Se treatments at the end of the experimental period, which suggests that there were fewer invertebrates present to consume algae at higher Se levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding suggests that there was no inhibition of algal growth by Se, and rather, that algal growth may have increased either indirectly—as a result of decreased grazing pressure (Graves et al, 2019a)—or directly—as a result of Se supplementation supporting algal growth (Abdel‐Hamid & Skulberg, 1995). In the present study, as well as in a previous study (Graves et al, 2019a), invertebrate biomass decreased in the higher Se treatments at the end of the experimental period, which suggests that there were fewer invertebrates present to consume algae at higher Se levels. However, it is possible that the increased algal growth occurred independently of the decreased invertebrate biomass—and the two possible explanations cannot be teased apart in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations