1984
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1984.59.3.939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Self-Verbalizations upon Emotional Arousal and Performance: A Test of Rational-Emotive Theory

Abstract: As a test of rational-emotive theory, the idea that our beliefs influence our emotions and subsequent overt behavior, 36 undergraduate women were presented rational, irrational, or neutral statements prior to and regarding their performance of a perceptual-motor task. Palmar skin resistance responses (SRRs) and forearm extensor muscle-action potentials (MAPs) were recorded to assess the relationship of covert self-verbalizations (generated by rehearsed statements), emotional or physiological arousal, and behav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
22
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of negative self-talk on performance anxiety and on depression has been confirmed in clinical research (Cramer & Kupshik, 1993;Huber & Mitchell Altmaier, 1983;Ingram, 1989;Missel & Sommer, 1983). A large number of studies shows that negative self-talk may also be operative in impairing the performance of creative tasks, problem solving skills and the control of fear (Meichenbaum, 1974;Meichenbaum & Cameron, 1974;Bonadies & Bass, 1984;Eifert & Lauterbach, 1987;Rosin & Nelson, 1983;Safran, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The impact of negative self-talk on performance anxiety and on depression has been confirmed in clinical research (Cramer & Kupshik, 1993;Huber & Mitchell Altmaier, 1983;Ingram, 1989;Missel & Sommer, 1983). A large number of studies shows that negative self-talk may also be operative in impairing the performance of creative tasks, problem solving skills and the control of fear (Meichenbaum, 1974;Meichenbaum & Cameron, 1974;Bonadies & Bass, 1984;Eifert & Lauterbach, 1987;Rosin & Nelson, 1983;Safran, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The irrational self-talk group evidenced the worst performance efficiency in the task. In a similar study of mirror tracing performance ( Bonadies and Bass, 1984 ) it was found that participants given rational self-talk statements were significantly more accurate than those given irrational self-talk statements, and a control group. The irrational self-talk group and control group were as inaccurate as each other, suggesting that rational self-talk is beneficial for performance, rather than irrational self-talk being damaging for performance.…”
Section: Moving the Area Forwardmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, in clinical psychology, Steffy et al 's (1970) study of 48 smokers suggested that self-talk was one of the treatment components that helped the smokers reduce their daily intake of cigarettes. Using performance on a perceptual-motor task as the dependent variable, Schill et al (1978) and Bonadies and Bass (1984) examined the hypothesis that rational selfstatements increase, and irrational self-statements decrease, behavioral efficiency in performance. The results of both studies indicated that persons designated as part of a rational self-statement group reduced errors and completed their tracings on a mirror-star tracing apparatus more quickly than a neutral or an irrational self-statement group.…”
Section: Self-talkmentioning
confidence: 99%