2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

34
202
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
34
202
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the relative water content and leaf area were not analyzed in this study, the data of soil water percentage (Table 1) supported this hypothesis. No significant differences were found in the composition of photosynthetic pigments between plants under sun or shade (Table 2) in contrast with the common notion that higher chlorophyll levels are expressed in shaded conditions (Almeida et al, 2005;Dias et al, 2007;Dai et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the relative water content and leaf area were not analyzed in this study, the data of soil water percentage (Table 1) supported this hypothesis. No significant differences were found in the composition of photosynthetic pigments between plants under sun or shade (Table 2) in contrast with the common notion that higher chlorophyll levels are expressed in shaded conditions (Almeida et al, 2005;Dias et al, 2007;Dai et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Usually in the dry season there is a reduction in photosynthetic assimilation and transpiration as a consequence of reduced stomatal conductance . Many ecophysiological studies involving sun and shade plants have reported comparisons between plants of different successional stages (Souza et al, 2005;Silvestrini et al, 2007;Portes et al, 2008) or of the same species (Nobel, 1976;Dias et al, 2007;Li et al, 2009;Dai et al, 2009). Although studies relating several successional stages are extremely important for understanding the function of the species that integrate an ecosystem, studies involving only one successional group in different environmental conditions, after human impacts, may help to understand the effect of forest fragmentation on the adaptive responses of these plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the dry weight of the shoots and roots under 0% shade was 24% and 22% lower than that under the 50% shade (Table 1). In Tetrastigma hemsleyanum, the low rate of electron transport through PSII and the high non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence values combined with unhealthy leaf morphology (smaller leaf size and yellow leaf color), as well as the low An of the plants grown under high light intensity suggested that excess light energy damaged the plants (Dai et al, 2009). This is thought to be due to the formation of destructive oxidative molecules, resulting in damage to the photosynthetic apparatus via photoinhibition (Aro et al, 1993;Krause, 1988).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, under low irradiance, ATP is too limited to allow for carbon fixation and carbohydrate biosynthesis. This leads to decreased plant growth and development (Dai et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, under certain environmental conditions, the absorbed light energy can be higher or lower than plant capacity to use it, creating an imbalance caused by photoinhibition or light deficiency. Under these conditions, crop development and yield are severely restricted (Ivanov et al, 2008;Daí et al, 2009;Craven et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%