1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(96)00079-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of shadowing types on ground-measured visible and near-infrared shadow reflectances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can note that different land covers have different spectral curves. Visible and near-infrared reflection of shadows are significantly affected by the surface type (Leblon et al, 1996). DN values received from shadowed areas that will be also affected by different land cover as from nonshadow area.…”
Section: Spectral Characteristics Of the Shadow Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can note that different land covers have different spectral curves. Visible and near-infrared reflection of shadows are significantly affected by the surface type (Leblon et al, 1996). DN values received from shadowed areas that will be also affected by different land cover as from nonshadow area.…”
Section: Spectral Characteristics Of the Shadow Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following values are introduced as Band Shadow Reduction Factors (BSRFs) and are estimated based on the work of Zhang et al (2015) and Leblon et al (1996).…”
Section: Larch Signal Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third method proposed includes the binary shadows, but also a parametrization of terrain shadowing by an inversion of the solar irradiation amount during the satellite overpass. The shadow reflectance in each of the second two approaches can only be estimated and is mainly based on the findings of Zhang et al (2015) and Leblon et al (1996). In default of the "true" and pure larch signal, results are compared to two other studies that also deal with larch reflectance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can either cause reduction or loss of information in the image. Reduction of information could potentially lead to the corruption of biophysical parameters derived from pixels values, such as vegetation indices (Leblon et al, 1996). Total loss of information could mean that the areas of the image cannot be interpreted, and value-added products, such as digital terrain models, cannot be created (Dare, 2005) Shadowed areas have been traditionally left unclassified or simply classified as shadows (Shackelford and Davis, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%