Effects of shear keys on nonlinear seismic responses of an arch-gravity dam

Abstract

In the paper, the added tangential nonlinear springs are introduced to represent the effects of one-way and two-way shear keys. The added tangential stiffness coefficient is relative to the joint opening and the relative tangential movement and determined numerically by using a refined model of shear keys. The user subroutine of nonlinear spring elements has been implemented into ABAQUS program. The seismic responses of an arch-gravity dam are mainly examined. It is shown by the results that a significant increase of about 17%-30% in joint opening can be observed for the dam with one-way shear keys; the two-way shear keys are beneficial to restrain the sliding displacement along both the radial and vertical directions, whereas the one-way shear keys mainly restrain the displacement along the radial direction; for the dam with shear keys, the maximum arch stress is increased, the cantilever stress is reduced, and the location of the maximum cantilever stress is also moved from the dam heel to the midheight of the cantilever. seismic responses, arch-gravity dam, contraction joints, shear keys, nonlinear spring elements Citation:Jiang S Y, Du C B, Yuan J W. Effects of shear keys on nonlinear seismic responses of an arch-gravity dam.

The Effect of Shear Sliding of Vertical Contraction Joints on Seismic Response of High Arch Dams with Fine Finite Element Model

“…e tangential sliding is restricted by introducing large tangential stiffness at the joints in [5][6][7]. Jiang et al [8] adopted soft contact model to consider joint opening. e nonlinear tangential spring is introduced to simulate the tangential movement of an arch-gravity dam during earthquake based on the Abaqus software.…”

Seismic analysis of high arch dams considering contraction-peripheral joints coupled effects

“…Sun [22] investigated the application of the shape memory alloy restrainer bars in reduction of the seismic response of arch dams with vertical contraction joints. Pan et al [23] compared three different procedures for the seismic analysis of gravity and arch dams. These procedures include the extended finite element method with cohesive constitutive relations, the crack band finite element method with plastic-damage relations, and the finite element Drucker-Prager elasto-plastic model.…”