2021
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of short‐interval disturbances continue to accumulate, overwhelming variability in local resilience

Abstract: Increasing rates of short-interval disturbances have the potential to rapidly transform ecosystems via shifts in post-disturbance regeneration. While research has explored compound events in multiple biomes, we know little regarding how local site conditions interact with short-interval disturbances to influence post-disturbance regeneration. Furthermore, questions remain regarding the consequences of continued high frequency events: What happens when emerging new communities are themselves subject to short-in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparatively, both systems demonstrate community stability except for high frequencies and magnitudes, an important commonality. Contrast with Hayes and Buma (2021), a similar multi-disturbance system in boreal forests with similar resilience mechanisms as Chileen et al, but where f values are >1. In that case, substantial ecosystem shifts were noted.…”
Section: E X Amplementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Comparatively, both systems demonstrate community stability except for high frequencies and magnitudes, an important commonality. Contrast with Hayes and Buma (2021), a similar multi-disturbance system in boreal forests with similar resilience mechanisms as Chileen et al, but where f values are >1. In that case, substantial ecosystem shifts were noted.…”
Section: E X Amplementioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, many miss the feedback between climate, fuels and future fire regimes (Franklin et al., 2014). There is also the potential for interacting and synergistic impacts, with shifts in fire regimes occurring alongside shifts in demographic traits and or climate change, which may increase extinction risk (Enright et al., 2015), cause shifts in forest composition (Hayes & Buma, 2021), and reduce biodiversity or ecosystem resilience (Stevens‐Rumann et al., 2018). Further work will concentrate on combining powerful fire regime simulations with population‐level demographic data to explore these complex feedbacks with greater realism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such demographic changes coupled with more frequent fire could narrow the interval for plant reproductive maturity and survival (“interval squeeze”; Enright et al., 2015), leading to decreased chances of population persistence and increased likelihood of extinction (Enright et al., 2015; Hoecker et al., 2020). Ecosystem‐level changes arising from too frequent fire can cause shifts from forest to non‐forested states (Bowman, 2000) or change forest structure and function (Hayes & Buma, 2021) with evidence that frequent fire favours grass over shrub species in some forest understoreys (Andersen et al., 2005; Watson et al, 2009; Murphy & Bowman, 2012; Hammill et al., 2016; Fairman et al., 2017). Understanding where such forest changes are most likely to occur could be used to prioritize management and resource allocation for activities such as fire suppression, pre‐emptive management and post‐fire restoration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, if a second fire occurs prior to the reconstruction of serotinous cones, there is little seed supply available for regeneration 16 , 18 and dispersal from unburned edges is generally less likely due to the relatively heavy seeds of conifers 16 . There is ample empirical evidence for this; short-interval fires with intervals less than 30-year intervals (less than the typical maturity time of black spruce of 30–40 years 19 have repeatedly resulted in a near or complete loss of black spruce seed and seedlings (e.g., 15 , 20 ). Other serotinous species show similar population declines after short-interval fires as well 13 , 14 , 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%