1978
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(78)90288-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of sialylation of influenza virions on their interactions with host cells and erythrocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the lack of outer arm fucosylation would further promote ␣-galactosylation. The presence of terminal ␣-Gal residues on the majority of the glycans in this study explains the previous observation that HA N-glycans obtained from virus grown in MDBK cells are poor acceptors for sialyltransferase (39).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In addition, the lack of outer arm fucosylation would further promote ␣-galactosylation. The presence of terminal ␣-Gal residues on the majority of the glycans in this study explains the previous observation that HA N-glycans obtained from virus grown in MDBK cells are poor acceptors for sialyltransferase (39).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, Huang et al (1980) argue that NA is needed to expose a second binding site on the NH 2 terminus of HA2 which is the part of the HA protein inserted into the virus envelope. The conclusion that HA is the binding protein is probably correct, although inhibition of haemagglutination does not necessarily show that virus fails to bind to an erythrocyte, merely that it can no longer cross-link them to cause agglutination (Lakshmi & Schultze, 1978). However, neutralized virus attached to chick embryo cells to the same extent as non-neutralized virus (Possee & Dimmock, 1981) recalling Mandel's (1967) data on poliovirus.…”
Section: Virus Surface Components Which Bind To Cell Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Enzymically desialylated SFV also retained full infectivity (Kennedy, 1974). The converse experiment, increasing sialylation of the surface glycoproteins of influenza virus which are normally devoid of NeuAc, did not affect the binding of virus to erythrocytes or MDBK cells but increased infectivity by up to 10-fold (Lakshmi & Schultze, 1978). There is no obvious explanation particularly since addition of NeuAc would be expected to increase repulsion between virus and the cell.…”
Section: Virus Surface Components Which Bind To Cell Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Observations made with other viruses relate to this. Addition of sialic acid to the haemagglutinin protein of influenza virus destroyed HA activity but not the capacity to attach to cells or infectivity (Lakshmi & Schulze, 1978). Proteolytic removal of the glycoproteins of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus did not decrease infectivity (Bruns & Lehmann-Grube, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%