1993
DOI: 10.1016/0301-6226(93)90066-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of silage quality, protein evaluation systems and milk urea content on milk yield and reproduction in dairy cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
35
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The cows with MUN under 10.0 mg/dl presented the worst gestation rate when compared to the cows with MUN above 10.1 mg/dL. Other studies also concluded that a concentration too low in MUN is related to a low fertility in dairy cows (Gustafsson and Carlsson, 1993). The results for AIR and cows in anestrous showed that the levels of MUN under 10.0 mg/dl, between 13.1 to 15.0 mg/dL and above 15.0 mg/dL presented the highest anestrous rates and the lowest AIR, coinciding with low gestation rates in the postpartum period of 55 to 70 days (Table 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cows with MUN under 10.0 mg/dl presented the worst gestation rate when compared to the cows with MUN above 10.1 mg/dL. Other studies also concluded that a concentration too low in MUN is related to a low fertility in dairy cows (Gustafsson and Carlsson, 1993). The results for AIR and cows in anestrous showed that the levels of MUN under 10.0 mg/dl, between 13.1 to 15.0 mg/dL and above 15.0 mg/dL presented the highest anestrous rates and the lowest AIR, coinciding with low gestation rates in the postpartum period of 55 to 70 days (Table 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…High levels of MUN usually reflect inadequate synchronism between the carbohydrates available to fermentation in the rumen and rates of degradable (RPD) and undegradability protein in the rumen (RUP) (Gustafsson and Carlsson, 1993). The basis for the usage of MUN as nutritional indicator is the high correlation between the MUN and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), due to the free diffusion of urea in the organic tissues (Moore et al, 1996/ Melendez et al, 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-protein fraction determination in cow's milk is useful for the cheese industry [15], for assessment of the potential nitrogen pollution by dairy cows [6], as indicator for the reproduction performances control [14] and for assessing feeding strategy of dairy animals [2]. This last point is particularly important in dairy cow farming systems, because the milk urea determination could improve the general metabolic efficiency of the producing animal, but could also help for a better economical management by reducing the protein overfeeding in the diet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interval between calving and the first service was found to be longer in herds with urea <4.5 mM compared with herds with urea between 4.5 and 5 mM in one study (Gustafsson and Carlsson, 1993) and in herds with low urea concentration in another study (Carlsson and Pehrson, 1993). Cows with low blood urea (<2.5 mM) and glucose also had poor fertility (Miettinen, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cows with low blood urea (<2.5 mM) and glucose also had poor fertility (Miettinen, 1991). These results have limited value because these analyses (1) were performed using the mean herd values (Gustafsson and Carlsson, 1993); (2) included low numbers of cows (Miettinen, 1991); and (3) measured urea only once at a fixed date without distinguishing before and after insemination. The only work that has analyzed the effect of changes with respect to the date of AI reported the opposite results, with increased conception success with low (<4.5 mM) and high (>6.5 mM) urea levels before AI compared with moderate urea values (Godden et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%